Published 6 issues per year
ISSN Print: 1072-8325
ISSN Online: 1940-431X
Indexed in
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ENGINEERING STUDENTS' IMAGINED FUTURES
ABSTRACT
Background: Future Time Perspective (FTP) theory addresses how the content and dimensions of people's imagined futures impact their learning and motivation. We used FTP theory to determine if gender differences existed in types of future events students envision and how these events were related to academic functioning. Purpose: In light of the intense national focus on career/life balance for women in the sciences, the focus of this study was to determine if students actually imagine such a trade-off when asked to think about the future. Design: We examined self-reported future events, motivation, and knowledge building from a sample of 366 engineering students. We analyzed the survey data using correlations, t-tests, and frequency counts to determine the relationship between imagined futures and academic functioning, as well as gender differences, respectively. Results: Results indicated that male students imagined significantly more professional events than female students, and that professional events were related to adaptive academic functioning. Analysis of the data suggests female engineering students self-reported a trade-off between professional and domestic events. Conclusions: We discuss the findings in the context of recent career/life balance initiatives and the need for improved industry mechanisms for helping women balance career and family.
-
Husman Jenefer, Hilpert Jonathan C., Brem Sarah K., Future Time Perspective Connectedness to a Career: The Contextual Effects of Classroom Knowledge Building, Psychologica Belgica, 56, 3, 2016. Crossref
-
Ijagbemi Christianah O., Kanakana Mukondeleli G., Campbell Harold M., Interventions and pathways for South African women in engineering and the built environment professions, African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 9, 6, 2017. Crossref
-
Wong Phoebe, Lee Daisy, M.L. Ng Peggy, Online search for information about universities: a Hong Kong study, International Journal of Educational Management, 32, 3, 2018. Crossref
-
Hilpert Jonathan, Marchand Gwen, Complex Systems Research and Evaluation in Engineering Education, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2017. Crossref
-
Heddy Benjamin C., Nelson Katherine G., Husman Jenefer, Cheng Katherine C., Goldman Jacqueline A., Chancey John B., The relationship between perceived instrumentality, interest and transformative experiences in online engineering, Educational Psychology, 41, 1, 2021. Crossref
-
Dubeau Annie, Plante Isabelle, Jutras-Dupont Camille, Samson Ghislain, Frenay Mariane, Understanding the Relationships between Psychological and Contextual Determinants, Motivation and Achievement Outcomes for Students in Vocational Training or Technical Training Programs, Vocations and Learning, 14, 1, 2021. Crossref
-
Scheidt Matthew, Godwin Allison, Berger Edward, Chen John, Self Brian P., Widmann James M., Gates Ann Q., Engineering students' noncognitive and affective factors: Group differences from cluster analysis, Journal of Engineering Education, 110, 2, 2021. Crossref
-
Potvin Geoff, McGough Catherine, Benson Lisa, Boone Hank J., Doyle Jacqueline, Godwin Allison, Kirn Adam, Ma Beverly, Rohde Jacqueline, Ross Monique, Verdin Dina, Gendered Interests in Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering: Intersections With Career Outcome Expectations, IEEE Transactions on Education, 61, 4, 2018. Crossref
-
Unger Alexander, Omari Soumia, Papastamatelou Julie, Working in Argan cooperatives is associated with the time perspectives of Amazigh women in the Moroccan region of Souss-Massa, Personality Science, 3, 2022. Crossref