Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Publicado 6 números por año

ISSN Imprimir: 1072-8325

ISSN En Línea: 1940-431X

SJR: 0.514 SNIP: 0.875 CiteScore™:: 2.4 H-Index: 27

Indexed in

EQUITY-MINDEDNESS IN DEVELOPMENTAL MATH: AN ANALYSIS OF CURRICULAR ARTIFACTS

Volumen 28, Edición 6, 2022, pp. 57-80
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2022033500
Get accessGet access

SINOPSIS

Although the community college plays an essential role in educating minoritized students in STEM-related fields, it is also a site where the compounding effects of systemic racism in the nation's educational system are abundantly clear. Due in large part to inequitable access to college-preparatory curriculum in secondary schooling, racially minoritized community college students are more likely than their White peers to be placed in developmental (remedial) math coursework, and less likely to complete the developmental requirements. Over the past decade, heightened concern with high rates of non-completion in developmental math has led community colleges to engage in an unprecedented level of reform, restructuring their programs in order to facilitate students' progression into college-level math and science courses. However, whether such reforms have improved minoritized students' opportunities to learn remains unclear. In this study, we applied a race-conscious analytical framework in order to explore the messages embedded in curricular artifacts from developmental math courses at a college pursuing reform. Using indicators of equity-mindedness, we examined the extent to which the curricular artifacts embody explicit messages about diversity and cultural inclusiveness, reflect aspects of culturally responsive teaching, or challenge assumptions embedded in the dominant approach to mathematics education (i.e., racial apathy and color blindness). In addition to documenting a lack of equity-mindedness and cultural inclusivity in our sample of cultural artifacts, our analysis offers a set of tools for researching and assessing ongoing developmental math reforms across community colleges.

REFERENCIAS
  1. Acevedo-Gil, N., Santos, R. E., Alonso, L., & Solorzano, D. G. (2015). Latinas/os in community college developmental education: Increasing moments of academic and interpersonal validation. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(2), 101-127. DOI: 10.1177/1538192715572893. DOI: 10.1177/1538192715572893

  2. Bahr, P. R. (2010). Preparing the underprepared: An analysis of racial disparities in postsecondary mathematics remediation. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(2), 209-237. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2010.11779049. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2010.11779049

  3. Bailey, T., Jeong, D. W., & Cho, S. W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 255-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002

  4. Bensimon, E. M., Dowd, A. C., Stanton-Salazar, R., & Davila, B. A. (2019). The role of institutional agents in providing institutional support to Latinx students in STEM. The Review of Higher Education, 42(4), 1689-1721. DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2019.0080. DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2019.0080

  5. Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom, L. E. (2012). Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the equity scorecard in theory and practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

  6. Bejerano, A. R., & Bartosh, T. M. (2015). Learning masculinity: Unmasking the hidden curriculum in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(2), 107-124. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2015011359. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2015011359

  7. Blair, R. M., Kirkman, E. E., & Maxwell, J. W. (2018). Statistical abstract of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences in the United States: Fall 2015 CBMS survey. American Mathematical Society.

  8. Center for Urban Education. (2017a). Improving postsecondary attainment: Overcoming common challenges to an equity agenda in state policy. Center for Urban Education, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.

  9. Center for Urban Education. (2017b). Syllabus review guide for equity-minded practice. Center for Urban Education, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.

  10. Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge University Press.

  11. Cox, R. D. (2015). "You've got to learn the rules" A classroom-level look at low pass rates in developmental math. Community College Review, 43(3), 264-286. DOI: 10.1177/0091552115576566. DOI: 10.1177/0091552115576566

  12. Cox, R. D., & Dougherty, M. (2019). (Mis) Measuring developmental math success: Classroom participants' perspectives on learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(4), 245-261. DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2018.1456378. DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2018.1456378

  13. Dowd, A. C. (2012). Developing supportive STEM community college to four-year college and university transfer ecosystems. In S. Olson & J. B. Labov (Eds.), Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape: Summary of a summit (pp. 107-134). The National Academies Press.

  14. Dowd, A. C., & Bensimon, E. M. (2015). Engaging the "race question ": Accountability and equity in U.S. higher education. Teachers College Press.

  15. Dowd, A. C., Malcom, L. E., & Bensimon, E. M. (2009). Benchmarking the success of Latina and Latino students in STEM to achieve national graduation goals. Los Angeles: Center for Urban Education, University of Southern California.

  16. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

  17. Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. DOI: 10.1080/13639080020028747. DOI: 10.1080/13639080020028747

  18. Engestrom, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge University Press.

  19. Frankenberg, E., Ee, J., Ayscue, J. B., & Orfield, G. (2019). Harming our common future: America's segregated schools 65 years after Brown. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23j1b9nvhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/23j1b9nv.

  20. Gholson, M. L., & Robinson, D. D. (2019). Restoring mathematics identities of Black learners: A curricular approach. Theory Into Practice, 58(4), 347-358. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2019.1626620. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2019.1626620

  21. Grubb, W. N., & Gabriner, R. (2013). Basic skills education in community colleges: Inside and outside of classrooms. Routledge.

  22. Grunert, J. (1997). The course syllabus: A learning-centered approach. Anker Publishing Company.

  23. Gutierrez, R. (2007). (Re)defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37-50). Teachers College Press.

  24. Hagedorn, L. S., & DuBray, D. (2010). Math and science success and nonsuccess: Journeys within the community college. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1). DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v16.i1.30. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v16.i1.30

  25. Hagedorn, L. S., & Purnamasari, A. V. (2012). A realistic look at STEM and the role of community colleges. Community College Review, 40(2), 145-164. DOI: 10.1177/0091552112443701. DOI: 10.1177/0091552112443701

  26. Harnish, R. J., & Bridges, K. R. (2011). Effect of syllabus tone: Students' perceptions of instructor and course. Social Psychology of Education, 14(3), 319-330. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-011-9152-4. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-011-9152-4

  27. Hoang, H., Huang, M., Sulcer, B., & Suleyman, Y. (2017). Carnegie Math Pathways 2015-2016 impact report: A five-year review. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Carnegie Math Pathways 2015-2016 Impact Report: A Five-Year Review (carnegiefoundation.org).

  28. Hurtado, S., Eagan, K. M., Tran, M. C., Newman, C. B., Chang, M. J., & Velasco, P. (2011). We do science here: Underrepresented students' interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553-579. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01714.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01714.x

  29. Jaggars, S. S., Hodara, M., Cho, S. W., & Xu, D. (2015). Three accelerated developmental education programs: Features, student outcomes, and implications. Community College Review, 43(1), 3-26. DOI: 10.1177/0091552114551752. DOI: 10.1177/0091552114551752

  30. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. DOI: 10.3102/00028312032003465. DOI: 10.3102/00028312032003465

  31. Larnell, G. V. (2016). More than just skill: Examining mathematics identities, racialized narratives, and remediation among black undergraduates. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 233-269. DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.47.3.0233. DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.47.3.0233

  32. Malcom, S., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2016). Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students'diverse pathways. The National Academies Press.

  33. Malcom-Piqueux, L. E., & Bensimon, E. M. (2017). Taking equity-minded action to close equity gaps, Peer Review, 19(2), 5-8.

  34. Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295-338.

  35. Martin, D. B. (2012). Learning mathematics while Black. Educational Foundations, 26, 47-66.

  36. McCoy, D. L., Luedke, C. L., & Winkle-Wagner, R. (2017). Encouraged or weeded out: Perspectives of students of color in the STEM disciplines on faculty interactions. Journal of College Student Development, 58(5), 657-673. DOI: 10.1353/csd.2017.0052. DOI: 10.1353/csd.2017.0052

  37. McGee, E. O. (2020). Black, brown, bruised: How racialized STEM education stifles innovation. Harvard Education Press.

  38. McGregor, S. L. T. (2004). Critical discourse analysis: A primer. Kappa Omicron Nu FORUM, 15(1). Retrieved from https://www.kon.org/archives/forum/15-1/mcgregorcda.html.

  39. McNair, T., Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom-Piqueux, L. E. (2020). From equity walk to equity talk: Expanding practitioner knowledge for racial justice in higher education. Jossey-Bass.

  40. Mesa, V., Suh, H., Blake, T., & Whittemore, T. (2012). Examples in college algebra textbooks: Opportunities for students' learning. Primus, 23(1), 76-105. DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2012.667515. DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2012.667515

  41. Miner, K. N., Diaz, I., & Rinn, A. N. (2017). Incivility, psychological distress, and math self-concept among women and students of color in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 23(3), 211-230. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017018506. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017018506

  42. Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Beacon Press.

  43. Museus, S. D., Palmer, R. T., Davis, R. J., & Maramba, D. C. (2011). Racial and ethnic minority students' success in STEM education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36(6), 1-140. DOI: 10.1002/aehe.3606. DOI: 10.1002/aehe.3606

  44. Nasir, N. S., & Cobb, P. (2007). Equity in students'access to significant mathematical ideas. Teachers College Press.

  45. National Research Council & National Academy of Engineering. (2012). Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape: Summary of a summit. The National Academies Press. National Science Foundation. (2019). 2017 National Survey of College Graduates, accessed using the Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System (SESTAT). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ sestat.

  46. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12441244. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12441244

  47. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.

  48. Parkes, J., & Harris, M. B. (2002). The purposes of a syllabus. College Teaching, 50(2), 55-61. DOI: 10.1080/87567550209595875. DOI: 10.1080/87567550209595875

  49. Quarles, C. L., & Davis, M. (2017). Is learning in developmental math associated with community college outcomes?, Community College Review, 45(1), 33-51. DOI: 10.1177/0091552116673711. DOI: 10.1177/0091552116673711

  50. Rendon, L. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19(1), 33-51. DOI: 10.1007/BF01191156. DOI: 10.1007/BF01191156

  51. Rendon, L. I., & Munoz, S. M. (2011). Revisiting validation theory: Theoretical foundations, applications, and extensions. Enrollment Management Journal, 2(1), 12-33.

  52. Reyes, M. E. (2011). Unique challenges for women of color in STEM transferring from community colleges to universities. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 241-263. DOI: 10.17763/ haer. 81.2.324m5t1535026g76.

  53. Roberts, M. T. (2019). Racism in remediation: How Black students navigate stereotypes to achieve success in developmental mathematics. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(10-12), 701-772. DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2019.1640143. DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2019.1640143

  54. Rodriguez, O., Cuellar Mejia, M., & Johnson, H. (2018). Remedial education reforms at California's community colleges: Early evidence on placement and curricular reforms. Public Policy Institute of California.

  55. Salinas, C. (2020). The complexity of the "x" in Latinx: How Latinx/a/o students identify with, and understand the term Latinx. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(2), 149-168. DOI: 10.1177/1538192719900382. DOI: 10.1177/1538192719900382

  56. Salinas, C., & Lozano, A. (2021). The history and evolution of the term Latinx. In E. G. Murillo, D. D. Bernal, S. Morales, L. Urrieta, E. R. Bybee, J. S. Munoz, V. B. Saenz, D. Villanueva, M. Machado-Casas, & K. Espinoza (Eds.) Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd edn. (pp. 249-263), Routledge.

  57. Shah, N. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1-42. DOI: 10.1177/016146811711900705. DOI: 10.1177/016146811711900705

  58. Silver, E. A., Mesa, V. M., Morris, K. A., Star, J. R., & Benken, B. M. (2009). Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 501-531. DOI: 10.3102/0002831208326559. DOI: 10.3102/0002831208326559

  59. Solorzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 60-73.

  60. Stinson, D. (2008). Negotiating sociocultural discourses: The counter-storytelling of academically (and mathematically) successful African American male students. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 975-1010. DOI: 10.3102/0002831208319723. DOI: 10.3102/0002831208319723

  61. Suarez-Orozco, C., Casanova, S., Martin, M., Katsiaficas, D., Cuellar, V., Smith, N. A., & Dias, S. I. (2015). Toxic rain in class: Classroom interpersonal microaggressions. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 151-160. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X15580314. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X15580314

  62. Sue, D. W., Lin, A. I., Torino, G. C., Capodilupo, C. M., & Rivera, D. P. (2009). Racial microaggressions and difficult dialogues in the classroom. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(2), 183-190. DOI: 10.1037/0000137-004. DOI: 10.1037/0000137-004

  63. Sue, D., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271-286. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271

  64. Sulik, G., & Keys, J. (2014). "Many students really do not yet know how to behave!" The syllabus as a tool for socialization. Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 151-160. DOI: 10.1177/0092055X13513243. DOI: 10.1177/0092055X13513243

  65. Trapani, J., & Hale, K. (2019). Higher education in science and engineering. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation.

  66. U.S. Department of Education (2014). Data snapshot: College and career readiness (Civil Rights Data Collection Issue Brief no. 3). Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/crdc-college-and-career-readiness-snapshot. pdf.

  67. Van Noy, M., & Zeidenberg, M. (2014). Hidden STEM knowledge producers: Community colleges' multiple contributions to STEM education and workforce development. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees, National Academy of Sciences.

  68. Walsemann, K. M., & Bell, B. A. (2010). Integrated schools, segregated curriculum: Effects of within-school segregation on adolescent health behaviors and educational aspirations. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1687-1695. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179424. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179424

  69. Wang, X. (2015). Pathway to a baccalaureate in STEM fields: Are community colleges a viable route and does early STEM momentum matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 376-393. DOI: 10.3102/0162373714552561. DOI: 10.3102/0162373714552561

  70. Wang, X. (2013). Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 664-692.

  71. Yamada, H., Bohannon, A. X., Grunow, A., & Thorn, C. A. (2018). Assessing the effectiveness of Quant-way: A multilevel model with propensity score matching. Community College Review, 46(3), 257-287. DOI: 10.1177/0091552118771754. DOI: 10.1177/0091552118771754

Próximos Artículos

Mitigating Barriers, Scaffolding Success: Institutional Supports for Black Undergraduate Women in Engineering Programs Meseret Hailu, Neelakshi Rajeev Tewari, Brooke Coley Underrepresented Students Pursuing Mathematics-Intensive Degrees: Changes after Transitioning to College Alison Marzocchi What do STEM Clubs do? The Effect of College Club Participation on Career Confidence and Gender Inclusion Guillermo Dominguez Garcia, Jennifer Glass Validating Practices and Messages that Promote Women’s Engineering Classroom Belongingness: An Intersectional Approach Dina Verdin, A Lili Castillo Examining the Role of Institutional Support on International Doctoral Women’s STEM Persistence and Mental Health Aisha Farra, Aashika Anantharaman, Sarah Swanson, Kerrie Wilkins-Yel, Jennifer Bekki, Nedim Yel, Ashley Randall, Bianca Bernstein Searching for safe space: Student veterans’ uneven pathways to STEM careers by race Brittany Hunt, Jae Hoon Lim Does Race, Ethnicity or Gender of the Mentor Affect Whether They Will be a “Good Mentor”? A Qualitative Analysis of Students’ Perceptions Reuben May, Christine Stanley, America Soto-Arzat, Jennifer Ackerman PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND TEAM MEMBER EFFECTIVENESS OF MINORITIZED STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Behzad Beigpourian, Matthew Ohland Perceptions of Department Chair Roles and Responsibilities in Career Progression and Success of Women STEM Faculty Stephanie Jones, Patricia Ryan Pal “Barbed-Wire Boundaries”: Hidden Curriculum, First-Generation and Low-Income Engineering Students, and Internship Acquisition Jerry Yang, Joseph Towles, Sheri Sheppard, Sara Atwood “I Want to Make an Impact”: The Science Identity and Career Goals of Black and Latinx Science and Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars Sylvia Mendez, Kathryn Watson, Kathryn Starkey, Valerie Conley Care Work, Science Brokering, and Career Motivations: How Hispanic/Latinx Young Adults in STEM Express Social Agency during the COVID-19 Pandemic Angela Frederick, Angelica Monarrez, Danielle Morales Bridging the gap: A sequential mixed methods study of trust networks in graduate application, admissions, and enrollment Cynthia Villarreal, Julie Posselt, Theresa Hernandez, Alexander Rudolph
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones Precios y Políticas de Suscripcione Begell House Contáctenos Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain