Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering

Publication de 6  numéros par an

ISSN Imprimer: 1543-1649

ISSN En ligne: 1940-4352

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.4 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.3 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 2.2 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00034 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.46 SJR: 0.333 SNIP: 0.606 CiteScore™:: 3.1 H-Index: 31

Indexed in

TOWARDS A POROELASTODYNAMICS FRAMEWORK FOR INDUCED EARTHQUAKES: EFFECT OF PORE PRESSURE ON FAULT SLIP

Volume 20, Numéro 3, 2022, pp. 81-98
DOI: 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2021041646
Get accessGet access

RÉSUMÉ

Earthquakes can be triggered after pore pressure perturbations activate critically stressed seismogenic faults, where the perturbations can originate from natural causes such as earth tides, rainfall, or snowfall or anthropogenic causes such as wastewater disposal, CO2 injection, oil production, or groundwater extraction. As the faults slip under the action of the induced stress field, seismic waves are spawned from the hypocenter location. The waves propagate through the domain with a velocity that evolves with the evolving pressure and stress fields. The effect of these waves on the surrounding rock and the seismic velocity recorded on the seismograph can be modeled accurately only by incorporating elastodynamics in the deformation model coupled with flow-induced pressure perturbations. Hitherto, most of the literature in the realm has been limited to elastostatics coupled with flow within a prescribed/kinematic or quasi-dynamic fault slip framework. In this work, we provide a framework for coupling of wave propagation with pore pressure perturbations using one-way coupled poroelastodynamics in the presence of faults in which the pore pressure is specified a priori as a spatiotemporal function. We present results from analysis of displacement and velocity fields in the domain and tractions and slip evolution on the fault. The rendition of two-way coupled poroelastodynamics in which the flow problem is also solved is proposed as future work.

RÉFÉRENCES
  1. Aagaard, B., Kientz, S., Knepley, M., Strand, L., and Williams, C., Pylith User Manual Version 2.1.0, Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics, 2013a.

  2. Aagaard, B.T., Knepley, M.G., and Williams, C.A., A Domain Decomposition Approach to Implementing Fault Slip in Finite-Element Models of Quasi-Static and Dynamic Crustal Deformation, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 3059-3079, 2013b.

  3. Basu, U. and Chopra, A.K., Perfectly Matched Layers for Time-Harmonic Elastodynamics of Unbounded Domains: Theory and Finite-Element Implementation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 192, nos. 11-12, pp. 1337-1375, 2003.

  4. Basumallik, A. and Eigenmann, R., Towards Automatic Translation of OpenMP to MPI, Proc. of the 19th Annual Int. Conf. on Supercomputing, pp. 189-198,2005.

  5. Ben-Zion, Y. and Rice, J.R., Dynamic Simulations of Slip on a Smooth Fault in an Elastic Solid, J. Geophys. Res., vol. 102, no. B8, pp. 17771-17784, 1997.

  6. Bizzarri, A. and Cocco, M., Slip-Weakening Behavior during the Propagation of Dynamic Ruptures Obeying Rate- and State-Dependent Friction Laws, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, vol. 108, no. B8, p. 2373, 2003.

  7. Carcione, J.M., Da Col, F., Currenti, G., and Cantucci, B., Modeling Techniques to Study CO2-Injection Induced Micro-Seismicity, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 42, pp. 246-257, 2015.

  8. Cottom, T.L., Using SWIG to Bind C++ to Python, Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 88-97,2003.

  9. Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., and Lewy, H., On the Partial Difference Equations of Mathematical Physics, IBM J. Res. Dev., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 215-234, 1967.

  10. Dana, S., Addressing Challenges in Modeling of Coupled Flow and Poromechanics in Deep Subsurface Reservoirs, PhD, The University of Texas at Austin, 2018.

  11. Dana, S., System of Equations and Staggered Solution Algorithm for Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Coupled with Linear Poromechanics, Phys. FluidDynam., arXiv:1912.04703,2019.

  12. Dana, S., Ganis, B., and Wheeler, M.F., A Multiscale Fixed Stress Split Iterative Scheme for Coupled Flow and Poromechanics in Deep Subsurface Reservoirs, J. Comput. Phys, vol. 352, pp. 1-22, 2018.

  13. Dana, S., Ita, J., and Wheeler, M.F., The Correspondence between Voigt and Reuss Bounds and the Decoupling Constraint in a Two-Grid Staggered Algorithm for Consolidation in Heterogeneous Porous Media, Multiscale Model. Simul., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 221-239, 2020.

  14. Dana, S. and Jha, B., A Fault Slip Model to Study Earthquakes Due to Pore Pressure Perturbations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.06257,2021.

  15. Dana, S. and Wheeler, M.F., Convergence Analysis of Fixed Stress Split Iterative Scheme for Anisotropic Poroelasticity with Tensor Biot Parameter, Computa. Geosci., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1219-1230, 2018a.

  16. Dana, S. and Wheeler, M.F., Convergence Analysis of Two-Grid Fixed Stress Split Iterative Scheme for Coupled Flow and Deformation in Heterogeneous Poroelastic Media, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 341, pp. 788-806, 2018b.

  17. Dana, S. and Wheeler, M.F., Design of Convergence Criterion for Fixed Stress Split Iterative Scheme for Small Strain Anisotropic Poroelastoplasticity Coupled with Single Phase Flow, Math. Numer. Anal., arXiv:1912.06476, 2019.

  18. Dana, S., Zhao, X., and Jha, B., Two-Grid Method on Unstructured Tetrahedra: Applying Computational Geometry to Staggered Solution of Coupled Flow and Mechanics Problems, Comput. Eng. Fin. Sci, arXiv:2102.04455, 2021.

  19. De Landro, G., Amoroso, O., Russo, G., and Zollo, A., 4D Travel-Time Tomography as a Tool for Tracking Fluid-Driven Medium Changes in Offshore Oil-Gas Exploitation Areas, Energies, vol. 13, no. 22, p. 5878, 2020.

  20. Di Toro, G., Han, R., Hirose, T., Paola, N., Nielsen, S., Mizoguchi, K., Ferri, F., Cocco, M., and Shimamoto, T., Fault Lubrication during Earthquakes, Nature, vol. 471, pp. 494-498,2011.

  21. Ellsworth, W.L., Giardini, D., Townend, J., Ge, S., and Shimamoto, T., Triggering of the Pohang, Korea, Earthquake (Mw 5.5) by Enhanced Geothermal System Stimulation, Seismol. Res. Lett., vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1844-1858, 2019.

  22. Foulger, G.R., Wilson, M.P., Gluyas, J.G., Julian, B.R., and Davies, R.J., Global Review of Human-Induced Earthquakes, Earth-Sci. Rev, vol. 178, pp. 438-514,2018.

  23. Hainzl, S., Kraft, T., Wassermann, J., Igel, H., and Schmedes, E., Evidence for Rainfall-Triggered Earthquake Activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 33, no. 19, 2006.

  24. Hashash, Y.M., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B., John, I., and Yao, C., Seismic Design and Analysis of Underground Structures, Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 247-293,2001.

  25. Jaeger, J.C. and Cook, N.G.W., Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, London: Chapman and Hall, 1979.

  26. Jha, B. and Juanes, R., Coupled Multiphase Flow and Poromechanics: A Computational Model of Pore Pressure Effects on Fault Slip and Earthquake Triggering, Water Res. Res., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 3776-3808, 2014.

  27. Jin, L. and Zoback, M.D., Fully Dynamic Spontaneous Rupture Due to Quasi-Static Pore Pressure and Poroelastic Effects: An Implicit Nonlinear Computational Model of Fluid-Induced Seismic Events, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 9430-9468,2018.

  28. Josuttis, N.M., The C++ Standard Library: A Tutorial and Reference, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2012.

  29. Kanamori, H. and Brodsky, E.E., The Physics of Earthquakes, Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 67, no. 8, p. 1429, 2004.

  30. Keranen, K.M. and Weingarten, M., Induced Seismicity, Ann. Rev. Earth and Planet. Sci., vol. 46, pp. 149-174, 2018.

  31. Klockner, A., Pinto, N., Lee, Y., Catanzaro, B., Ivanov, P., and Fasih, A., PyCUDA and PyOpenCL: A Scripting-Based Approach to GPU Run-Time Code Generation, Parallel Comput., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 157-174, 2012.

  32. Lee, S., Min, S.J., and Eigenmann, R., OpenMP to GPGPU: A Compiler Framework for Automatic Translation and Optimization, ACMSIGPLANNotices, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 101-110, 2009.

  33. Liu, C., Linde, A.T., and Sacks, I.S., Slow Earthquakes Triggered by Typhoons, Nature, vol. 459, no. 7248, pp. 833-836, 2009.

  34. Meguerdijian, S. and Jha, B., Quantification of Fault Leakage Dynamics Based on Leakage Magnitude and Dip Angle, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., vol. 42, pp. 2303-2320, 2021.

  35. Meng, C., Benchmarking Defmod, an Open Source FEM Code for Modeling Episodic Fault Rupture, Comput. Geosci., vol. 100, pp. 10-26,2017.

  36. Millman, K.J. and Aivazis, M., Python for Scientists and Engineers, Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 9-12, 2011.

  37. Moehle, J., Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2015.

  38. Montgomery-Brown, E., Shelly, D.R., and Hsieh, P.A., Snowmelt-Triggered Earthquake Swarms at the Margin of Long Valley Caldera, California, Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 3698-3705, 2019.

  39. Newmark, N.M., A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics, J. Eng. Mech. Div., vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 67-94, 1959.

  40. Okubo, P.G., Dynamic Rupture Modeling with Laboratory-Derived Constitutive Relations, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, vol. 94, no. B9, pp. 12321-12335, 1989.

  41. Scholz, C.H., Tan, Y.J., and Albino, F., The Mechanism of Tidal Triggering of Earthquakes at Mid-Ocean Ridges, Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1,pp. 1-7,2019.

  42. Thomas, M.Y., Lapusta, N., Noda, H., and Avouac, J.P., Quasi-Dynamic versus Fully Dynamic Simulations of Earthquakes and Aseismic Slip with and without Enhanced Coseismic Weakening, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, vol. 119,no. 3,pp. 1986-2004, 2014.

  43. Urata, Y., Yamashita, F., Fukuyama, E., Noda, H., and Mizoguchi, K., Apparent Dependence of Rate- and State-Dependent Friction Parameters on Loading Velocity and Cumulative Displacement Inferred from Large-Scale Biaxial Friction Experiments, Pure Appl. Geophys., vol. 174, pp. 23-43,2017.

  44. van den Ende, M., Chen, J., Ampuero, J.P., and Niemeijer, A., A Comparison between Rate-and-State Friction and Microphysical Models, Based on Numerical Simulations of Fault Slip, Tectonophysics, vol. 733, pp. 273-295, 2018.

  45. Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S.C., and Varoquaux, G., The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation, Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 22-30, 2011.

  46. Wang, H.F., Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.

  47. Wittenbrink, C.M., Kilgariff, E., and Prabhu, A., Fermi GF100 GPU Architecture, IEEE Micro, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 50-59,2011.

  48. Zhao, X. and Jha, B., Role of Well Operations and Multiphase Geomechanics in Controlling Fault Stability during CO2 Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery, J. Geophys. Res., vol. 1, no. 21, pp. 1-17, 2019.

  49. Zhao, X. and Jha, B., A New Coupled Multiphase Flow-Finite Strain Deformation-Fault Slip Framework for Induced Seismicity, J Comput. Phys, vol. 433, p. 110178,2021.

  50. Zoback, M.D. and Gorelick, S.M., Earthquake Triggering and Large-Scale Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 109, no. 26, pp. 10164-10168,2012.

CITÉ PAR
  1. Dana Saumik, Zhao Xiaoxi, Jha Birendra, A two-grid simulation framework for fast monitoring of fault stability and ground deformation in multiphase geomechanics, Journal of Computational Physics, 466, 2022. Crossref

Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections Prix et politiques d'abonnement Begell House Contactez-nous Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain