Library Subscription: Guest
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Published 6 issues per year

ISSN Print: 1072-8325

ISSN Online: 1940-431X

SJR: 0.514 SNIP: 0.875 CiteScore™:: 2.4 H-Index: 27

Indexed in

PERCEPTIONS OF ENGINEERING FACULTY ON EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION AT HISPANIC-SERVING INSTITUTIONS

Volume 27, Issue 6, 2021, pp. 21-57
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2021034722
Get accessDownload

ABSTRACT

As the educator of nearly one-third of all Latinx engineering graduates in the United States, Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) are at the forefront of innovating engineering curriculum for Latinx students. In many cases, the driving force behind these innovations in engineering is the faculty. This study aims to identify the assets and challenges that engineering faculty at HSIs perceive impact their ability to engage in educational innovation and, ultimately, create inclusive and learner-centered educational experiences. Specifically, the thematic analysis of workshop artifacts enabled the researchers to examine the perspectives of 24 engineering educators from two- and four-year colleges across the Southwestern and Southeastern United States who attended one of two National Science Foundation-sponsored workshops. The artifact analysis illustrates how engineering educators at HSIs recognized particular assets to leverage when innovating within their courses and departments, both from within and outside of their institutions. At the same time, these educators also acknowledged barriers to innovation from various sources, including personal, interpersonal, and administrative. Recognizing that faculty experiences can vary based on their position's responsibilities, this study also begins to explore the differences in perception of educational innovation across instructional and tenure-line faculty. These differences across faculty types suggest an opportunity to bring different perspectives and skillsets to educational innovation collaborations that include faculty from diverse backgrounds and roles. Overall, this study provides a foundation for future research on factors impacting faculty engagement with inclusive and learner-centered pedagogy at institutions seeking to serve Latinx and other racially and ethnically diverse students.

REFERENCES
  1. APLU. (2018). Status report on engineering education. .

  2. Baggeroer, D., Both, T., Doorley, S., Ford, C., Estrada, E., O'Connor, C., Ramirez, L., Utley, J., & Witthoft, S. (2018). Design thinking bootleg. Stanford d.School. Retrieved from https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg. .

  3. Ballysingh, T. A., Zerquera, D. D., Turner, C. S., & Saenz, V. B. (2017). Answering the call: Hispanic-serving institutions as leaders in the quest for access, excellence, and equity in American higher education. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 11(3). .

  4. Benedict, B., Maxey, K., Verdin, D., & Godwin, A. (2020). A review of agenticframeworks in engineering education. Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. .

  5. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Cox, M. F., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Changing engineering education: Views of US faculty, chairs, and deans. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 193-219. .

  6. Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 53-66. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x. .

  7. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x. .

  8. Brunhaver, S. R., Jesiek, B. K., Coso Strong, A., Korte, R. F., & Stevens, R. (2019). Special session: Research on engineering practice: Catalyzing a scholarly community. Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. American Society for Engineering Education/IEEE, San Jose, CA. .

  9. Brunhaver, S. R., Jesiek, B. K., Korte, R. F., & Coso Strong, A. (2019). Research on engineering practice: catalyzing a scholarly community (poster). National Science Foundation EEC Grantees Conference, Arlington, VA. .

  10. Brunhaver, S. R., Korte, R. F., Barley, S. R., & Sheppard, S. (2018). Bridging the gaps between engineering education and practice. In R. B. Freeman & H. Salzman (Eds.), U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy (pp. 129-63). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. .

  11. Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. (2013). The borderlands of education: Latinas in engineering. Washington, DC: Lexington Books. .

  12. Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5(2), eaau4734. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4734. .

  13. Coso Strong, A., Kendall, M. R., Basalo, I., & Henderson, G. (2019). Impact of faculty development workshops on instructional faculty at Hispanic-serving institutions. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. .

  14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. .

  15. Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924-42. DOI: 10.3102/0002831209349460. .

  16. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work (English ed.). Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers. .

  17. Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women's positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5964-9. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613117114. .

  18. Dika, S. L., & Martin, J. P. (2018). Bridge to persistence: Interactions with educators as social capital for Latina/o engineering majors. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(3), 202-15. DOI: 10.1177/1538192717720264. .

  19. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-20. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x. .

  20. Eagan Jr., M. K., Jaeger, A. J., & Grantham, A. (2018). Supporting the academic majority: Policies and practices related to part-time faculty job satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 86(3). .

  21. Excelencia in Education. (2017). Latino faculty in postsecondary education (Highlighting what works for Latino student success). Retrieved from https://www.edexcelencia.org/media/163. .

  22. Excelencia in Education. (2020). Hispanic-serving institutions (HSIs): 2018-19 fact sheet. Excelencia in Education. .

  23. Finelli, C. J., Daly, S. R., & Richardson, K. M. (2014). Bridging the research-to-practice gap: Designing an institutional change plan using local evidence. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 331-61. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20042. .

  24. Finelli, C. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2019). Improving student learning in undergraduate engineering education by improving teaching and assessment. Advances in Engineering Education, 1-30. .

  25. Fitzmorris, C. W., Shehab, R., & Trytten, D. (2016). The career goals of non-tenure-track full-time engineering faculty. 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/ FIE.2016.7757520. .

  26. Fitzmorris, C. W., Shehab, R., & Trytten, D. (2020). As necessary as the cleaning crew: Experiences of respect and inclusion among full-time non-tenure-track electrical engineering faculty at research-intensive institutions. IEEE Transactions on Education, 1-10. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2020. 2978643. .

  27. Flores, S. M., & Park, T. J. (2015). The effect of enrolling in a minority-serving institution for Black and Hispanic students in Texas. Research in Higher Education, 56(3), 247-76. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-014-9342-y. .

  28. Fosnacht, K., & Nailos, J. N. (2016). Impact of the environment: How does attending a Hispanic-serving institution influence the engagement of baccalaureate-seeking Latina/o students? Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 15(3), 187-204. DOI: 10.1177/1538192715597739. .

  29. Garcia, G. A. (2017). Defined by outcomes or culture? Constructing an organizational identity for Hispanic-serving institutions. American Educational Research Journal, 54(Suppl 1), 111S-134S. DOI: 10.3102/0002831216669779. .

  30. Garcia, G. A. (2018). Decolonizing Hispanic-serving institutions: A framework for organizing. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(2), 132-47. .

  31. Garcia, G. A. (2019). Becoming Hispanic-serving institutions: Opportunities for colleges and universities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. .

  32. Garcia, G. A., Nunez, A.-M., & Sansone, V. A. (2019). Toward a multidimensional conceptual framework for understanding "servingness" in Hispanic-serving institutions: A synthesis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 745-84. DOI: 10.3102/0034654319864591. .

  33. Garcia, G. A., & Okhidoi, O. (2015). Culturally relevant practices that "serve" students at a Hispanic serving institution. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 345-57. DOI: 10.1007/s10755-015-9318-7. .

  34. Goller, M., & Harteis, C. (2014). Employing agency in academic settings: Doctoral students shaping their own experiences. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses on professional learning: On the boundary between learning and working (pp. 189-210). The Netherlands: Springer. .

  35. Harper, S. R. (2010). An anti-deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 63-74. DOI: 10.1002/ir.362. .

  36. Hasbun, I. M., & Coso Strong, A. (2020). WIP: Identifying structural and cultural characteristics of Hispanic-serving institutions in engineering education-a morphogenetic approach. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. .

  37. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-84. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20439. .

  38. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102. .

  39. Henderson, G., Kendall, M. R., Basalo, I., & Coso Strong, A. (2019). Co-designed research agenda to foster educational innovation efforts within undergraduate engineering at HSIs. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. .

  40. Henriksen, D., Gretter, S., & Richardson, C. (2020). Design thinking and the practicing teacher: Addressing problems of practice in teacher education. Teaching Education, 31(2), 209-29. DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2018.1531841. .

  41. Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities. (2018). 2018fact sheet: Hispanic higher education and HSIs. HACU Office of Policy Analysis and Information. .

  42. HSI STEM Hub. (2020). HSI STEM hub | Network of Hispanic serving institutions. HSI STEM Resource Hub. Retrieved from https://hsistemhub.org/. .

  43. IDEO (Ed.). (2015). The field guide to human-centered design: Design kit (1st ed). IDEO. .

  44. IES: NCES. (2020). IPEDS: The integratedpostsecondary education data system. Retrieved from https:// nces.ed.gov/ipeds. .

  45. Johansson-Skoldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Qetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121-46. DOI: 10.1111/caim.12023. .

  46. Kendall, M. R., Choe, N. H., Denton, M., & Borrego, M. (2018a). Engineering identity development of Hispanic students. ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/22520/view. .

  47. Kendall, M. R., Coso Strong, A., Basalo, I., & Henderson, G. (2018b). Rethinking engineering education at Hispanic serving institutions. Retrieved from http://eel.utep.edu/hsi/. .

  48. Kendall, M. R., Coso Strong, A., Basalo, I., & Henderson, G. (2019a). Exploring faculty perceptions of students ' characteristics at Hispanic-serving institutions. Presented at Track: Faculty - Technical Session I. 2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, Crystal City, Virginia. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/148/papers/24997/view. .

  49. Kendall, M. R., Coso Strong, A., Basalo, I., Henderson, G., Ural, D., & Williams, M. (2019b). Co-designing an engineering education research agenda [Public Research Report]. Retrieved from http://eel.utep. edu/hsi/workshop-outcomes.html. .

  50. Kendall, M. R., Denton, M., Choe, N. H., Procter, L. M., & Borrego, M. (2019c). Factors influencing engineering identity development of Latinx students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(3), 173-80. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2019.2909857. .

  51. Kezar, A. (2013). Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(5), 571-598. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-013-9288-5. .

  52. Kober, L. (2015). Reaching students: What research says about effective instruction in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/18687. .

  53. Kouprie, M., & Visser, F. S. (2009). A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user's life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), 437-48. DOI: 10.1080/09544820902875033. .

  54. Lee, W. C., & Matusovich, H. M. (2016). A model of co-curricular support for undergraduate engineering students: Model of co-curricular support. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 406-30. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20123. .

  55. Linder, C., Harris, J. C., Allen, E. L., & Hubain, B. (2015). Building inclusive pedagogy: Recommendations from a national study of students of color in higher education and student affairs graduate programs. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(2), 178-94. DOI: 10.1080/10665684.2014.959270. .

  56. Lund, T. J., & Stains, M. (2015). The importance of context: An exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8. .

  57. Maestas, R., Vaquera, G. S., & Zehr, L. M. (2007). Factors impacting sense of belonging at a Hispanic-serving institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6(3), 237-56. DOI: 10.1177/1538192707302801 .

  58. Mann, L., & Daly, S. (2009). Design research and design practice: A framework for future investigations. 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. .

  59. Marin, P. (2019). Is "business as usual" enough to be Hispanic-serving? Becoming a Hispanic-serving research institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 18(2), 165-81. DOI: 10.1177/1538192719832250. .

  60. McConnell, D. A., Chapman, L., Czajka, C. D., Jones, J. P., Ryker, K. D., & Wiggen, J. (2017). Instructional utility and learning efficacy of common active learning strategies. Journal of Geoscience Education; Bellingham, 65(4), 604-25. DOI: 10.5408/17-249.1. .

  61. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. .

  62. Montoya, Y., Rimada, A. E. P., Delgado, E. I., Webb, I. N., & Kendall, M. R. (2015). Developing leaders by putting students in the curriculum development driver's seat. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. .

  63. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). MSI report STEM workforce. The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/25257. .

  64. National Science Foundation. (2017). Dear colleague letter: Improving undergraduate STEM education in Hispanic serving institutions (HSIs). Retrieved from https://nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17092/nsf17092. jsp. .

  65. Newstetter, W. C., Behravesh, E., Nersessian, N. J., & Fasse, B. B. (2010). Design principles for problem-driven learning laboratories in biomedical engineering education. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 38(10), 3257-67. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0063-x. .

  66. Newstetter, W. C., Kurz-Milcke, E., & Nersessian, N. J. (2004). Agentive learning in engineering research labs. 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004., T2F/7-T2F12 Vol. 1. DOI: 10.1109/ FIE.2004.1408503. .

  67. NSF EHR Subcommittee. (2017a). Gathering feedback regarding development of NSF's new Hispanic-serving institutions program summary of August 2017 listening sessions. Retrieved from https://www. nsf.gov/ehr/Materials/ListeningSessionsReport.pdf. .

  68. NSF EHR Subcommittee. (2017b). Report to the education and human resources advisory committee on building capacity at Hispanic serving institutions. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/ehr/Materials/ HSISubcommitteeReport.pdf. .

  69. Nunez, A.-M., Crisp, G., & Elizondo, D. (2016). Mapping Hispanic-serving institutions: A typology of institutional diversity. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 55-83. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2016.11777394. .

  70. Nunez, A.-M., & Elizondo, D. (2015). Institutional diversity among four-year Hispanic-serving institutions. In A.-M. Nunez, S. Hurtado, & Calderon Galdeano (Eds.), Hispanic-serving institutions: Advanced research and transformative practice (pp. 65-81). Milton Park, UK: Routledge. .

  71. Nunez, A.-M., Hurtado, S., & Calderon Galdeano, E. (2015). Why study Hispanic-serving institutions? In A.-M. Nunez, S. Hurtado, & E. Calderon Galdeano (Eds.), Hispanic-serving institutions: Advanced research and transformative practice (pp. 1-24). Milton Park, UK: Routledge. .

  72. Nunez, A.-M., Ramalho, E. M., & Cuero, K. K. (2010). Pedagogy for equity: Teaching in a Hispanic- serving institution. Innovative Higher Education, 35(3), 177-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10755-010-9139-7. .

  73. Panke, S. (2019). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281-306. DOI: 10.1515/edu-2019-0022. .

  74. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-7. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12441244. .

  75. Piskadlo, K. S. (2016). A case study on the influence of organizational structures and policies on faculty implementation of learner-centered teaching [PhD dissertation]. University of Massachusetts, Boston. .

  76. Pleasants, J., & Olson, J. K. (2019). What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K-12 education. Science Education, 103(1), 145-66. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21483. .

  77. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-38. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x. .

  78. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 8. .

  79. Prince, M. J., Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 283-94. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00939.x. .

  80. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-48. DOI: 10.3102/0034654312457429. .

  81. Revelo, R. A., & Baber, L. D. (2018). Engineering resistors: Engineering Latina/o students and emerging resistant capital. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(3), 249-69. .

  82. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. .

  83. Samuelson, C. C., & Litzler, E. (2016). Community cultural wealth: An assets-based approach to persistence of engineering students of color. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 93-117. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20110. .

  84. Santiago, D. (2012). Finding your workforce: The top 25 institutions graduating latinos in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) by academic level-2009-2010 (Linking College Completion with U.S. Workforce Needs). Excelencia in Education. .

  85. Secules, S., Coso Strong, A., & Fletcher, T. (2020). Who engineering includes impacts how engineers work: Diversity challenges and design thinking solutions. In Implementation strategies for improving diversity in organizations (pp. 224-48). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. .

  86. Simmons, D. R., & Lord, S. M. (2019). Removing invisible barriers and changing mindsets to improve and diversify pathways in engineering. Advances in Engineering Education, 1-22. .

  87. Stevens, R., Johri, A., & O'Connor, K. (2013). Professional engineering work. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 119-38). Cambridge University Press. .

  88. Stolk, J. D., & Martello, R. (2018). Reimagining and empowering the design of projects: A project-based learning goals framework. San Jose, CA: FIE. Retrieved from https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings-article/fie/2018/08658981/18j9mTgfjxe. .

  89. Swartz, M., Leydens, J. A., Johnson, K., & Walter, J. D. (2019). Is sociotechnical thinking important in engineering education?: Survey perceptions of male and female undergraduates. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/is-sociotechnical-thinking-important-in-engineering-education-survey-perceptions-of-male-and-female-undergraduates. .

  90. Thedwall, K. (2008). Nontenure-track faculty: Rising numbers, lost opportunities. New Directions for Higher Education, 143, 11-9. DOI: 10.1002/he. .

  91. Treuren, K. W. V., & Jordan, W. M. (2019). What do engineering students really need for the workplace and life? 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Retireved from https://peer.asee.org/what-do-engineering-students-really-need-for-the-workplace-and-life. .

  92. Walther, J., Brewer, M. A., Sochacka, N. W., & Miller, S. E. (2020). Empathy and engineering formation. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 11-33. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20301. .

  93. Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being: A model of empathy in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123-48. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20159. .

  94. Watson, K., Yoon, S. Y., Shields, S. M., & Barroso, L. (2019). Diverse engineering faculty's perceptions and practice of active learning at a Southwestern university. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 18. .

  95. Zenke, P. F. (2014). Higher education leaders as designers. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology (pp. 249-59). Springer International Publishing. .

  96. Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. W. (2002). Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151-7. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2002.tb00687.x. .

Forthcoming Articles

Mitigating Barriers, Scaffolding Success: Institutional Supports for Black Undergraduate Women in Engineering Programs Meseret Hailu, Neelakshi Rajeev Tewari, Brooke Coley Underrepresented Students Pursuing Mathematics-Intensive Degrees: Changes after Transitioning to College Alison Marzocchi What do STEM Clubs do? The Effect of College Club Participation on Career Confidence and Gender Inclusion Guillermo Dominguez Garcia, Jennifer Glass Validating Practices and Messages that Promote Women’s Engineering Classroom Belongingness: An Intersectional Approach Dina Verdin, A Lili Castillo Examining the Role of Institutional Support on International Doctoral Women’s STEM Persistence and Mental Health Aisha Farra, Aashika Anantharaman, Sarah Swanson, Kerrie Wilkins-Yel, Jennifer Bekki, Nedim Yel, Ashley Randall, Bianca Bernstein Searching for safe space: Student veterans’ uneven pathways to STEM careers by race Brittany Hunt, Jae Hoon Lim Does Race, Ethnicity or Gender of the Mentor Affect Whether They Will be a “Good Mentor”? A Qualitative Analysis of Students’ Perceptions Reuben May, Christine Stanley, America Soto-Arzat, Jennifer Ackerman PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND TEAM MEMBER EFFECTIVENESS OF MINORITIZED STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Behzad Beigpourian, Matthew Ohland Perceptions of Department Chair Roles and Responsibilities in Career Progression and Success of Women STEM Faculty Stephanie Jones, Patricia Ryan Pal “Barbed-Wire Boundaries”: Hidden Curriculum, First-Generation and Low-Income Engineering Students, and Internship Acquisition Jerry Yang, Joseph Towles, Sheri Sheppard, Sara Atwood “I Want to Make an Impact”: The Science Identity and Career Goals of Black and Latinx Science and Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars Sylvia Mendez, Kathryn Watson, Kathryn Starkey, Valerie Conley Care Work, Science Brokering, and Career Motivations: How Hispanic/Latinx Young Adults in STEM Express Social Agency during the COVID-19 Pandemic Angela Frederick, Angelica Monarrez, Danielle Morales Bridging the gap: A sequential mixed methods study of trust networks in graduate application, admissions, and enrollment Cynthia Villarreal, Julie Posselt, Theresa Hernandez, Alexander Rudolph
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections Prices and Subscription Policies Begell House Contact Us Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain