年間 4 号発行
ISSN 印刷: 1050-6934
ISSN オンライン: 1940-4379
Indexed in
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Loss with Different Implant Systems, Primary Stability, Bone Density and Soft Tissue Thickness: A Retrospective Study
要約
Aim: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare, among various implant systems, the influence of primary stability and the bone density and soft tissue biotype of the patient on the amount of peri-implant crestal bone loss after 1 year using radiography.
Materials and methods: Included in this retrospective study were patient records of 3583 implant placements utilized from an online dental information archiving software (DIAS). Clinical and radiographic assessments were conducted concurrently with implant placement (baseline) and 1 year post surgery. Statistical analysis was done to examine the mean marginal bone loss significance in the three different implant systems groups (group I: Straumann Roxolid SLAc-tive, group II: Nobel Biocare CC, group III: Straumann SLA), different primary stability values, different bone density. and soft tissue biotype at the time of implant placement.
Results: A significant difference was observed in the crestal bone loss with different implant systems used. Group I showed significantly lesser amounts of crestal bone loss when compared to groups II and III. However, the differences in the bone density, ISQ values, and the soft tissue biotype did not exhibit a statistically significant difference in the amount of crestal bone loss.
Conclusion: Significant MBL preservation for implants with Straumann SLActive when compared to Nobel Biocare CC and Straumann SLA implants. No significant changes were observed with respect to primary stability, bone density, and soft tissue thickness and no correlation among early crestal bone loss and IT, ISQ at surgery, and ISQ at reopening was observed. Straumann Roxolid SLActive implants showed less crestal bone loss probably owing to its hydrophilic surface modification. However, more studies need to be done to evaluate the same.
-
Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Editorial: Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:639-640.
-
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler BR, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Jan 1;10(6):387-416.
-
Callan DP, O'Mahony A, Cobb CM. Loss of crestal bone around dental implants. Implant Dent. 1998;7:258-266.
-
Cune MS, Verhoeven JW, de Putter C. Reliability of some clinical parameters in implant dentistry. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1998;105:166-169.
-
Agarwal S, Ashok V, Maiti S, Agarwal V. Dentists preference toward fixed versus removable implant prosthesis on edentulous jaws to improve quality of life. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;33(1):83-9.
-
Ponnanna AA, Maiti S, Rai N, Jessy P. Three-dimensional-printed malo bridge: Digital Fixed prosthesis for the partially edentulous maxilla. Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Oct;12(4):451.
-
Gopal TM, Subhashree R, Thiyaneswaran N, Maiti S. Effect of submandibular fossa on implant length in the posterior mandibular region. J LongTerm Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(3):219-226.
-
Agarwal S, Ashok V, Maiti S. Open- or closed-tray impression technique in implant prosthesis: A dentist's perspective. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30:193-198.
-
Rupawat D, Maiti S, Nallaswamy D, Sivaswamy V. Aesthetic outcome of implants in the anterior zone after socket preservation and conventional implant placement:A retrospective study. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(4).
-
Tulsani M, Subhashree R, Maiti S, Nesappan T. Impact of level of crestal placement on marginal bone loss: A retrospective institutional study. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(4).
-
Kushali R, Maiti S, Girija SAS, Jessy P. Evaluation of microbial leakage at implant systems: An in vitro study. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;32(2):87-93.
-
Simons WF, De Smit M, Duyck J, Coucke W, Quirynen M. The proportion of cancellous bone as predictive factor for early marginal bone loss around implants in the posterior part of the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26(9):1051-9.
-
Aparna J, Maiti S, Jessy P. Polyether ether ketone - As an alternative biomaterial for metal Richmond-crown-3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24(6):553-7.
-
Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:270-276.
-
Sunitha VR, Ramakrishnan T, Kumar SS, Emmadi P. Soft tissue preservation and crestal bone loss around single-tooth implants. J Oral Implantol. 2008 Aug;34(4):223-9.
-
Saglanmak A, Gultekin A, Cinar C, Karabuda C, Szmukler-Moncle S. The effect of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone loss of early loaded implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Oct 1;31(1):180-17.
-
Akcali A, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Sun C, Petrie A, Nibali L, Donos N. What is the effect of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone loss around dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Sep;28(9):1046-53.
-
Strauss FJ, Siegenthaler M, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I, Jung RE, Thoma DS. Restorative angle of zirconia restorations cemented on non-original titanium bases influences the initial marginal bone loss: 5-year results of a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jul;33(7):745–56.
-
Calvo-Guirado JL, Gomez-Moreno G, Lopez-Mari L, Guardia J, Negri B, Martinez-Gonzalez JM. Crestal bone loss evaluation in osseotite expanded platform implants: A 5-year study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Dec;22(12):1409-14.
-
Venugopalan S, R S, N T, Maiti S. An analysis of implant prosthesis and its dynamic occlusal contacts. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;33(1):1-7.