Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

Publicou 4 edições por ano

ISSN Imprimir: 1050-6934

ISSN On-line: 1940-4379

SJR: 0.184 SNIP: 0.485 CiteScore™:: 1.1 H-Index: 39

Indexed in

Commonly Used Implant Dimensions in the Posterior Maxilla - A Retrospective Study

Volume 32, Edição 1, 2022, pp. 25-32
DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2021038617
Get accessDownload

RESUMO

Implant therapy is a treatment option to ensure prosthesis survival rate and it is also done as a fixed dental prosthesis for replacing single and multiunit gaps. Posterior maxilla often has insufficient bone quality and quantity; for this reason it makes implant placement challenging in the site. Posterior edentulous maxilla presents special challenges to implant surgeons that are unique to this region compared to other regions of the maxilla. Thus, the aim of this study is to determine the common implant dimensions used in posterior maxilla. Completed case sheets were collected from a private dental hospital software system. Case sheets were taken from June 2019 to March 2020. Data was retrieved and evaluated by two reviewers. The parameters taken were patients, age groups, gender, teeth indicated for implants (maxillary premolars and molars), implant height, and implant width. Two-hundred fifty-four implants have been placed on the posterior maxilla of which 139 were premolars and 115 were molars. There was no statistical significance between the implants placed in both males and females (p value: 0.274). Between the age groups, the highest number of implants was seen in 41-60 years (n = 146) followed by 17-40 years (n = 78) and finally > 61 years (n = 30). The p value was 0.000, which was statistically significant. Various implant sizes for posterior maxilla have been introduced due to its challenging site. Thus in our study, we can see there is a difference in sizes for premolars and molars. Implant dimensions with increased height are used in the premolars compared to the molars. Implant dimensions with increased width are used in the molars compared to the premolars. In general, implant width and implant height can range from 3.6 to 4.5 mm and implant height ranging from 9.50 to 12.00 mm.

Referências
  1. Ahamed TS. Awareness of dental implant on general population. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2016;8(7):632. .

  2. Kanchana S, Hussain S. Zirconia a bioinert implant material. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2013;12(6):66-7. .

  3. Rajaraman V, Dhanraj M, Jain AR. Dental implant biomaterials-newer metals and their alloys. Drug Invention Today. 2018;10(6):986-9. .

  4. Manvi S, Goyal P, Arya S. Prosthodontic management of hemimandibulectomy patient: Implants, a better solution. J Dent Implants. 2016;6:37. doi: 10.4103/ 0974-6781.190385. .

  5. Sekar V, Sengottaiyan V, Ganapathy D. Implant considerations and surface modifications-literature review. Drug Invention Today. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 2]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ Vinothkumar_Sengottaiyan2/publication/332568805_Implant_considerations_and_surface_modifications_-_A_Hterature_review/links/5d1b5b76458515c11c0a1ba9/Implant-considerations-and-surface-modifications-A-literature-review.pdf .

  6. Aravind K, Ganapathy DM, Ramanathan V. A review on intra-operative and post-operative bleeding during implant placement in completely edentulous patients. Drug Invention Today. 2019;12(10). .

  7. Raja SV. Management of the posterior maxilla with sinus lift: Review of techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1730-4. .

  8. Kannan A, Nesappan T, Ganapathy D, Jain A. Rehabilitation of a partially edentulous arch with implant-supported and tooth-supported fixed prostheses: A case report. Drug Invention Today. 2018 Dec 1;10(12). .

  9. Javed F, Romanos GE. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jan;19(1):1-10. .

  10. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Grondahl K, Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: A 5-year retrospective analysis of the Branemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Jul;12(4):504-14. .

  11. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991 Jan;62(1):2-4. .

  12. Pavithra K, Ganapathy D. Awareness of direct sinus lift procedure in implant treatment planning among dental students. Drug Invention Today. 2020;14:660-4. .

  13. Thoma DS, Cha J-K, Jung U-W. Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: Short implants versus long implants in augmented bone. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Feb;47(1):2-12. .

  14. Mendonja JA, Francischone CE, Senna PM, Matos de Oliveira AE, Sotto-Maior BS. A retrospective evaluation of the survival rates of splinted and non-splinted short dental implants in posterior partially edentulous jaws. J Periodontal. 2014;85(6):787-94. .

  15. Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Garda-Nogales A, Fu J-H, Wang H-L. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (< 10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(10):1119-24. .

  16. Lee J-S, Kim H-M, Kim C-S, Choi S-H, Chai J-K, Jung U-W. Long-term retrospective study of narrow implants for fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):847-52. .

  17. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu J-F, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Small-diameter implants: Indications and contraindications. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(4):186-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00221.x. .

  18. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P, Marinello CP. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: A 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 May;16(3):355-66. .

  19. Froum SJ, Cho S-C, Cho YS, Elian N, Tarnow D. Narrow-diameter implants: A restorative option for limited interdental space. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Oct;27(5):449-55. .

  20. Nesappan T, Ariga P. Comparison of stresses around dental implants placed in normal and fibula reconstructed mandibular models using finite element analysis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Aug;8(8):ZC45-50. .

  21. Gupta A, Dhanraj M, Sivagami G. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: A literary overview. Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;21(3):433-8. .

  22. Vidhya G, Nesappan T. A piezoelectric surgery for direct sinus lift with immediate implant placement. J Dent Implants. 2016 Jul 1;6(2):79. .

  23. Ashok V, Nallaswamy D, Benazir Begum S, Nesappan T. Lip bumper prosthesis for an acromegaly patient: A clinical report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14(Suppl 1):279-82. .

  24. Anbu RT, Suresh V, Gounder R, Kannan A. Comparison of the efficacy of three different bone regeneration materials: An animal study. Eur J Dent. 2019 Feb;13(1):22-8. .

  25. Venugopalan S, Ariga P, Aggarwal P, Viswanath A. Case report: Magnetically retained silicone facial prosthesis. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Mar 27;17(2):260-4. .

  26. Balaji S, Gajendran P. Correlation of gingival thickness with gingival width, probing depth and papillary fill in mandibular anterior teeth. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018;11(9):3918-22. .

  27. Madhavan S, Gajnedran PL. A preliminary study to compare the pain perception of topical gel versus injected local infiltration/block anaesthesia during non-surgical periodontal therapy. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018;11(10):4257-62. .

  28. Janani and Gajendran PL. Anti-plaque efficacy of cure next gel, hoirasa gel in comparison with chlorhexidine gel. A randomised control trial study. Res J Pharm Tech nol. 2018;11(8):3689-92. .

  29. Abhinav RP, Selvarasu K, Maheswari GU, Taltia AA. The patterns and etiology of maxillofacial trauma in South India. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;9(1):114-7. .

  30. Sweta VR, Abhinav RP, Ramesh A. Role of virtual reality in pain perception of patients following the administration of local anesthesia. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;9(1):110-3. .

  31. Abdul Wahab PU, Senthil Nathan P, Madhulaxmi M, Muthusekhar MR, Loong SC, Abhinav RP. Risk factors for post-operative infection following single piece osteotomy. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017 Sep;16(3):328-32. .

  32. Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of coated surfaces influencing screw loosening in implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Dent. 2017 Nov;8(6):496-502. .

  33. Pandurangan KK, Veeraiyan DN, Nesappan T. In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and cyclic fatigue resistance of computer-aided design-on and hand-layered zirconia crowns following cementation on epoxy dies. J Indian Prosthodontic Soc. 2020 Jan;20(1):90. .

  34. Kannan A, Venugopalan S. A systematic review on the effect of use of impregnated retraction cords on gingiva. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018;11(5):2121-6. .

  35. Ashok V, Ganapathy D. A geometrical method to classify face forms. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Jul;9(3):232-5. .

  36. Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of coated surfaces influencing screw loosening in implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Dent. 2017;8:496-502. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1493. .

  37. Jain AR. Clinical and functional outcomes of implant prostheses in fibula free flaps. World J Dent. 2017 Jun;8(3):171-6. .

  38. Ariga P, Nallaswamy D, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of correlation of width of maxillary anterior teeth using extraoral and intraoral factors in Indian population: A systematic review. World J Dent. 2018 Feb;9(1):68-75. .

  39. Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and Incisal marginal discrepancy in ceramic laminate veneering materials: A SEM analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Apr;8(2):272-8. .

  40. Jain AR. Prevalence of partial edentulousness and treatment needs in rural population of South India. World J Dent. 2017 Jun;8(3):213-7. .

  41. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of nonoriginal abutments with implants: Evaluation of microgap at the implant-abutment interface, with original and nonoriginal abutments. Implant Dent. 2019 Jun;28(3):289-95. .

  42. Gupta P, Ariga P, Deogade SC. Effect of monopoly-coating agent on the surface roughness of a tissue conditioner subjected to cleansing and disinfection: A contact profilometric study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jun;9(Suppl 1):S122-6. .

  43. Varghese SS, Ramesh A, Veeraiyan DN. Blended module-based teaching in biostatistics and research methodology: A retrospective study with postgraduate dental students. J Dent Educ. 2019 Apr;83(4):445-50. .

  44. Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M, Beirne OR. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Mar;13(2):175-82. .

  45. Bahat O. Branemark system implants in the posterior max-illa: Clinical study of660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep;15(5):646-53. .

  46. Rashika V. Psychological impacts of implant patients. Int J Rec Adv Multidisc Res. 2015;2:540-2. .

  47. Gayathri MM. Knowledge and awareness among patients about dental implants. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2016;8(5):351. .

  48. Lorenz J, Blume M, Korzinskas T, Ghanaati S, Sader RA. Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study. Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Jan 22;5(1):3. .

  49. Murali R, Jain AR. Knowledge, attitude, and practice on impression materials used for implant placement among dental students and dental practitioners. Drug Invention Today. 2018;10(4). .

  50. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F. Wide-diameter implants: Analysis of clinical outcome of 304 fixtures. J Periodontal. 2007 Jan;78(1):52-8. .

  51. Rodriguez X, Mendez V, Vela X, Segala M. Modified surgical protocol for placing implants in the pterygomaxillary region: Clinical and radiologic study of 454 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov;27(6):1547-53. .

  52. Ormianer Z, Piek D, Livne S, Lavi D, Zafrir G, Palti A, Harel N. Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants. Implant Dentistry. 2012;21:350-6. doi: 10.1097/ id.0b013e31825feb16. .

  53. Mangano FG, Shibli JA, Sammons RL, Iaculli F, Piattelli A, Mangano C. Short (8-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: A prospective clinical study with 1-to 10-years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):933-40. .

  54. Oliveira R, El Hage M, Carrel J-P, Lombardi T, Bernard J-P. Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla after sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone: A 9-year clinical study. Implant Dent. 2012 Oct;21(5):422-6. .

  55. Manso MC, Wassal T. A 10-year longitudinal study of 160 implants simultaneously installed in severely atrophic posterior maxillas grafted with autogenous bone and a synthetic bioactive resorbable graft. Implant Dent. 2010 Aug;19(4):351-60. .

  56. Krennmair G, Waldenberger O. Clinical analysis of wide-diameter frialit-2 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep;19(5):710-5. .

  57. Peleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z. Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: A 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Jan;21(1):94-102. .

  58. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(Suppl 2):35-51. .

  59. Hemani K, Dhanraj M, Jain AR. Contributing factors for peri-implantitis in endosseous dental implants-a review. Drug Invention Today. 2018;10(5). .

CITADO POR
  1. Milenkovic Jovana, Vasiljevic Milica, Jovicic Nemanja, Milovanovic Dragan, Selakovic Dragica, Rosic Gvozden, Criteria for the Classification of the Interradicular Septum Shape in Maxillary Molars with Clinical Importance for Prosthetic-Driven Immediate Implant Placement, Diagnostics, 12, 6, 2022. Crossref

Próximos artigos

Transfer of guided emergence profile developed using customized provisional implant restoration and cementation using an abutment replica technique- A case report. Vinay Sivaswamy, Balaji Anand S D, Jacob Mathew Philip, C J Venkatakrishnan, Narasimman M, Helen Mary Abraham, Pavithra B Marijuana use is Associated with Increased Rates of Hip Dislocation and Lower Insurance Reimbursement among THA Recipients Andrew Recker, Chukwuweike Gwam, Erin Kelly, Scott Douglas, Johannes Plate Surface modification of Mg alloy AZ91D using nanopowder mixed EDM for Biodegradable Implant Alok Kumar, Abhishek Singh The history of orthopedics in the long term: from general medicine to medical specialties Pavlos Altsitzioglou, Ioannis Zafeiris, Fotini Soucacos, Pantelis Limneos, Eleftheria Souliotis, Evanthia Mitsiokapa, Theodosis Saranteas, Andreas Mavrogenis COMPARISON OF ROUGHNESS, WETTABILITY AND SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY FEATURES BETWEEN SANDBLASTED ACID-ETCHED AND OXIDIZED TITANIUM DENTAL IMPLANTS Kshitiz Chhabra, Arvina Rajasekar CORRELATION BETWEEN PRIMARY STABILITY OF DENTAL IMPLANTS AND BONE DENSITY: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS Padmaja S, Arvina Rajasekar C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - less implant equals quicker normalization Kasım Kılıçarslan, Ömer Faruk Naldöven, Enejd Veizi, Şahan Güven, Şahin Çepni, Ahmet Fırat COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING SHORT FEMORAL NAIL FIXATION FOR INTETROCHANTERIC HIP FRACTURES. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Anastasia Vasilopoulou, Antonios Trichonas, Konstantinos Palaiologos, Emmanouel Antonogiannakis, Christos Nikakis, Stavros Angelis, Spyridon Maris, Christos Grekas , Efthimios Karadimas, Alexandros Apostolopoulos FEA: Connector Designs and Pontic Stress Distribution of Fixed Partial Denture Implant-Supported Metal Framework Saja Muhsin, Enas Mohammed, Khalid Bander Design and Frequency Stability Analysis of an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System based Artificial Pacemaker Controller in MATLAB Nader Jafarnia Dabanloo, Asghar Dabiriaghdam, Fereidoon Nooshirvan Rahatabad, Keivan Maghooli Complications following intraosseous injections of calcium phosphate bone cement in Subchondroplasty. Christos Zachariadis, Helen Leligou, Stauros Kourkoulis, Evaggelos Magnisalis, Panayiotis Papagelopoulos, Olga Savvidou The Impact of Patient Characteristics on Outcomes of Surgically Managed Vertebral Osteomyelitis in the United States: Insights from a National Database Study Jennifer Kurowicki, Stuart Changoor, Daniel Coban, Neil Patel, Kumar Sinha, Ki Hwang, Arash Emami ASSOCIATION OF AGE, GENDER AND SITE OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT - AN INSTITUTION BASED RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Harini Sri, Nabeel Ahmed, Keerthi Shasanka
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa Políticas de preços e assinaturas Begell House Contato Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain