Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Computational Thermal Sciences: An International Journal

Publicou 6 edições por ano

ISSN Imprimir: 1940-2503

ISSN On-line: 1940-2554

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.5 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.3 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00017 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.28 SJR: 0.279 SNIP: 0.544 CiteScore™:: 2.5 H-Index: 22

Indexed in

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND CFD SIMULATION OF HEAT TRANSFER AND FRICTION FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS IN THE CROSSFLOW TUBE BANK

Volume 14, Edição 5, 2022, pp. 21-46
DOI: 10.1615/ComputThermalScien.2022042368
Get accessGet access

RESUMO

The thermal efficiency of the crossflow tube bank with four different geometries is investigated for a broad range of Reynolds numbers. The computational flow dynamics (CFD) simulation and empirical analyses for heat transfer, exergy loss, and friction factor were performed. Two parameters, including Nu/f and J/f ratios, are calculated and compared to assess the different geometries thoroughly. According to the obtained results, the cam-shaped tube showed the best overall performance, whereas the circular tube had the lowest performance. The possible improvement was because of the lower relative pressure drop and higher relative heat-transfer improvement, which considerably increases the dissipation of the heat. The effect of geometry has a noticeable impact on the outcome of both thermal and hydrodynamic performances of the tube banks, as a smoother transition in geometry helps reduce the pressure drop exerted by the staggered arrangement of the tube. However, the higher turbulence generation rate can lead to a more improved heat-transfer coefficient, but the combined effect of the tube geometry would decide the overall performance. Moreover, an exergy analysis was conducted for the geometries studied in this paper. Since the scarcity of this type of examination in this field, it can help even further understanding of this section of heat-transfer science.

Figures

  • Structure of the experimental setup
  • Boundary conditions of the test section
  • Schematic of tube geometries; (a) cam-shaped tube bank, (b) circular tube bank, (c) convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical
tube bank
  • Structured mesh over the computational domain and boundary layer mesh around tubes; (a) cam-shaped tube bank, (b)
circular tube bank, (c) convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical tube bank
  • Comparison of (a) average Nusselt number and (b) drag coefficient for experimental and numerical models of the camshaped tube bank
  • Average Nusselt number and drag coefficient vs. the number of grid elements for the cam-shaped tube at Re = 13,000
  • Temperature contours at Re1 = 13,000, Re2 = 16,500, Re3 = 20,000 for (a) cam-shaped tube bank, (b) circular tube
bank, (c) convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical tube bank
  • Turbulent KE contours at Re1 = 13,000, Re2 = 16,500, and Re3 = 20,000 for (a) cam-shaped tube bank, (b) circular tube
bank, (c) convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical tube bank
  • Streamlines at Re1 = 13,000, Re2 = 16,500, Re3 = 20,000 for (a) cam-shaped tube bank, (b) circular tube bank, (c)
convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical tube bank
  • X velocity vectors at Re1 = 13, Re2 = 16,500, Re3 = 20,000 for (a) cam-shaped tube bank, (b) circular tube bank, (c)
convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical tube bank
  • Pressure contours at Re1 = 13,000, Re2 = 16,500, Re3 = 20,000 for (a) cam-shaped tube bank, (b) circular tube bank,
(c) convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical tube bank
  • Comparison of equivalent Nu vs. Re for experimental and numerical models at four columns of tubes for (a) cam-shaped
tube bank, (b) circular tube bank, (c) convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical tube bank
  • Comparison of drag coefficient vs. Re for experimental and numerical models at four columns of tubes for (a) camshaped tube bank, (b) circular tube bank, (c) convex tube bank, and (d) elliptical tube bank
  • Comparison of friction factor vs. Re for experimental and numerical models at four tube geometries: cam-shaped tube
bank, circular tube bank, convex tube bank, and elliptical tube bank
  • Comparison of Nu/f ratio vs. Re for experimental and numerical models at four tube geometries: cam-shaped tube bank,
circular tube bank, convex tube bank, and elliptical tube bank
  • Comparison of J/f ratio vs. Re for experimental and numerical models at four tube geometries: cam-shaped tube bank,
circular tube bank, convex tube bank, and elliptical tube bank
  • Comparison of exergy loss vs. Re for the numerical model at four tube geometries: cam-shaped tube bank, circular tube
bank, convex tube bank, and elliptical tube bank
Referências
  1. Ahmadi, S., Ghaebi, H., and Shokri, A., A Comprehensive Thermodynamic Analysis of a Novel CHP System Based on SOFC and APC Cycles, Energy, vol. 186, no. 1,p. 115899,2019.

  2. Ahmed, S.A.E.S., Mesalhy, O.M., and Abdelatief, M.A., Flow and Heat Transfer Enhancement in Tube Heat Exchangers, Heat Mass Transf., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1607-1630,2015.

  3. Ahmed, S.E.S., Ibrahiem, E.Z., Mesalhy, O.M., and Abdelatief, M.A., Effect of Attack and Cone Angels on Air Flow Characteristics for Staggered Wing Shaped Tubes Bundle, Heat Mass Transf., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1001-1016,2015.

  4. Akilli, H., Karakus, C., Akar, A., Sahin, B., and Tumen, N.F., Control of Vortex Shedding of Circular Cylinder in Shallow Water Flow Using an Attached Splitter Plate, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 1-13,2008.

  5. Anderson, E.A. and Szewczyk, A.A., Effects of a Splitter Plate on the near Wake of a Circular Cylinder in 2 and 3-Dimensional Flow Configurations, Exp. Fluids, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 161-174,1997.

  6. Apelt, C.J., West, G.S., and Szewczyk, A.A., The Effects of Wake Splitter Plates on the Flow past a Circular Cylinder in the Range 104 < R < 5x104, J. FluidMech., vol. 61, no. 1,pp. 187-198,1973.

  7. Baines, W.D., Heat Transfer of a Cylinder in Crossflow, New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1987.

  8. Dizaji, H.S., Jafarmadar, S., and Hashemian, M., The Effect of Flow, Thermodynamic and Geometrical Characteristics on Exergy Loss in Shell and Coiled Tube Heat Exchangers, Energy, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 678-684,2015.

  9. Grove, A.S., Shair, F.H., and Petersen, E.E., An Experimental Investigation of the Steady Separated Flow past a Circular Cylinder, J. Fluid Mech, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 60-80,1964.

  10. Hamrang, F., Shokri, A., Mahmoudi, S.M.,Ehghaghi, B., and Rosen, M.A., Performance Analysis of a New Electricity andFresh- water Production System Based on an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Multi-Effect Desalination, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 1-29,2020.

  11. Hasan, M.A.Z. and Budair, M.O., Role of Splitter Plates in Modifying Cylinder Wake Flows, AIAA J, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1992-1998,1994.

  12. Ibrahim, E. and Moawed, M., Forced Convection and Entropy Generation from Elliptic Tubes with Longitudinal Fins, Energy Convers. Manage, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1946-1954,2009.

  13. Ibrahim, T.A. and Gomaa, A., Thermal Performance Criteria of Elliptic Tube Bundle in Crossflow, Int. J. Therm.. Sci., vol. 48, no. 11,pp. 2148-2158,2009.

  14. Kawai, H., A Discrete Vortex Analysis of Flow around a Vibrating Cylinder with a Splitter Plate, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 259-273,1990.

  15. Khan, W.A., Culham, J.R., and Yovanovich, M.M., Convection Heat Transfer from Tube Banks in Crossflow: Analytical Approach, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 49, nos. 25-26, pp. 4831-4838,2006.

  16. Kwon, K. and Choi, H., Control of Laminar Vortex Shedding behind a Circular Cylinder Using Splitter Plates, Phys. Fluids, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 479-486,1996.

  17. Lecordier, J.-C., Hamma, L., and Paranthoen, P., The Control of Vortex Shedding behind Heated Circular Cylinders at Low Reynolds Numbers, Exp. Fluids, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 224-229,1991.

  18. Malekzadeh, S. and Sohankar, A., Reduction of Fluid Forces and Heat Transfer on a Square Cylinder in a Laminar Flow Regime Using a Control Plate, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 15-27,2012.

  19. Mangrulkar, C.K., Dhoble, A.S., Chakrabarty, S.G., and Wankhede, U.S., Experimental and CFD Prediction of Heat Transfer and Friction Factor Characteristics in Cross Flow Tube Bank with Integral Splitter Plate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 964-978,2017a.

  20. Mangrulkar, C.K., Dhoble, A.S., Deshmukh, A.R., and Mandavgane, S.A., Numerical Investigation of Heat Transfer and Friction Factor Characteristics from In-Line Cam Shaped Tube Bank in Crossflow, Appl. Therm. Eng, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 521-538, 2017b.

  21. Mittal, S., Kumar, V., and Raghuvanshi, A., Unsteady Incompressible Flows past Two Cylinders in Tandem and Staggered Arrangements, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1315-1344,1997.

  22. Ostanek, J.K. and Thole, K.A., Wake Development in Staggered Short Cylinder Arrays within a Channel, Exp. Fluids, vol. 53, no. 3,pp. 673-697,2012.

  23. Park, W.-C. and Higuchi, H., Numerical Investigation of Wake Flow Control by a Splitter Plate, KSME Int. J, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 123-131,1998.

  24. Patankar, S.V., Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2018.

  25. Paul, S.S., Ormiston, S.J., and Tachie, M.F., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Cross-Flow in a Staggered Tube Bundle, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 387-414,2008.

  26. Puttur, U., Ahmadi, M., Ahmadi, B., and Bigham, S., A Novel Lung-Inspired 3D-Printed Desiccant-Coated Heat Exchanger for High-Performance Humidity Management in Buildings, Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 252, no. 1, p. 115074,2022.

  27. Roshko, A., Experiments on the Flow past a Circular Cylinder at Very High Reynolds Number, J. FluidMech, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 345-356,1961.

  28. Roshko, A., On the Wake and Drag of Bluff Bodies, J. Aeronaut. Sci., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 124-132,1955.

  29. Sarkar, S. and Sarkar, S., Large-Eddy Simulation of Wake and Boundary Layer Interactions behind a Circular Cylinder, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 131, no. 9, pp. 1-13,2009.

  30. Sayed Ahmed, S.A.E., Mesalhy, O.M., and Abdelatief, M.A., Effect of Longitudinal-External-Fins on Fluid Flow Characteristics for Wing-Shaped Tubes Bundle in Crossflow, J. Thermodyn, vol. 2015, no. 1,pp. 1-15,2015.

  31. Shakibi, H., Afzal, S., Shokri, A., and Sobhani, B., Utilization of a Phase Change Material with Metal Foam for the Performance Improvement of the Photovoltaic Cells, J. Energy Storage, vol. 51, no. 1, p. 104466,2022.

  32. Sparrow, E.M. and Kang, S.S., Longitudinally-Finned Cross-Flow Tube Banks and Their Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 339-350,1985.

  33. Sumner, D., Two Circular Cylinders in Cross-Flow: A Review, J. Fluids Struct, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 849-899,2010.

  34. Tiwari, S., Chakraborty, D., Biswas, G., and Panigrahi, P.K., Numerical Prediction of Flow and Heat Transfer in a Channel in the Presence of a Built-In Circular Tube with and without an Integral Wake Splitter, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 439-453,2005.

  35. Turki, S., Numerical Simulation of Passive Control on Vortex Shedding behind Square Cylinder Using Splitter Plate, Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 514-524,2008.

  36. Yasuo, M., Kunio, H., and Takayoshi, N., A Fundamental Study of Symmetrical Vortex Generation behind a Cylinder by Wake Heating or by Splitter Plate or Mesh, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1193-1201,1986.

  37. Zukauskas, A. and Ulinskas, R., Heat Transfer in Tube Banks in Crossflow, Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, 1988.

Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa Políticas de preços e assinaturas Begell House Contato Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain