Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
Главный редактор: Subrata Saha (open in a new tab)

Выходит 4 номеров в год

ISSN Печать: 1050-6934

ISSN Онлайн: 1940-4379

SJR: 0.184 SNIP: 0.485 CiteScore™:: 1.1 H-Index: 39

Indexed in

Comparative Evaluation of Anchorage Loss with Implant-Aided Retraction and Frictionless Mechanics with Conventional Anchorage in Bimaxillary Protrusion Cases

Том 31, Выпуск 4, 2021, pp. 21-26
DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2021035965
Get accessDownload

Краткое описание

Management of anchorage and good control of molars in all three planes of space is necessary for optimal results. It is of paramount importance for the clinician to select the appropriate anchorage control. The aim of the study was to compare the anchorage loss from implant-aided retraction and frictionless mechanics retraction in bimaxillary protrusion cases. Cephalograms of 40 patients were evaluated in this retrospective study, segregated into two groups based on their retraction mechanics. Anchorage loss was determined from measurements made on pretreatment and postretraction lateral cephalograms. Mean and standard deviation from independent sample t-tests were used to analyze the anchorage loss between the two groups. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 20.0. In the implant-aided group, mean anchorage loss was 0.95 ± 0.36 mm; in the frictionless mechanics with conventional anchorage group, the mean anchorage loss was 2.44 ± 0.46 mm. The average interincisal angle in the frictionless mechanics group and the implant-aided retraction group was 99.45 ± 5.41° and 100.15 ± 4.85°, indicating similar incisor inclinations in the pretreatment group. Pretreatment interincisal angle measurement ensured that both groups had similar anchorage demands. Anchorage loss was greater in frictionless mechanics with conventional anchorage (2.44 m) when compared to implant-aided retraction mechanics (0.95 mm). Implant-aided retraction can thus be considered for cases requiring absolute anchorage.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА
  1. Hassan AH, Turkistani AA, Hassan MH. Skeletal and dental characteristics of subjects with incompetent lips. Saudi Med J. 2014 Aug;35(8):849-54. .

  2. Owman-Moll P, Ingervall B. Effect of oral screen treatment on dentition, lip morphology, and function in children with incompetent lips. Am J Orthod. 1984 Jan;85(1): 37-46. .

  3. Guay AH, Baker RW. A roentgenograph-cephalometric evaluation of anchorage management in maximum anchorage cases. Am J Orthod. 1967 Feb 1;53(2):148. .

  4. Mahendran S. Status of malocclusion among adults in rural areas. Int J Curr Adv Res. 2017 Mar;6(3):2958-60. .

  5. Atik E, Gorucu-Coskuner H, Taner T. Comparison of orthodontic treatment with different premolar extraction modalities in terms of soft tissue profile. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2019 0ct;22(4):390-401. .

  6. Young TM, Smith RJ. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: A comparison of changes during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 May;103(5):452-8. .

  7. Celenza F. Implant-enhanced tooth movement: Indirect absolute anchorage. Int J Periodont Restore Dent. 2003 Dec;23(6):533-41. .

  8. Young KA, Melrose CA, Harrison JE. Skeletal anchorage systems in orthodontics: Absolute anchorage. A dream or reality? J Orthod. 2007 Jun;34(2):101-10. .

  9. Ganesh ML, Pandian SK. Acceleration of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment-a frontier in orthodontics. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2017;9(5):741. .

  10. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier; 2007. .

  11. Staggers JA, Germane N, Fortson WM. A comparison of the effects of first premolar extractions on third molar angulation. Angle Orthod. 1992;62(2):135-8. .

  12. Badawi HM, Toogood RW, Carey JPR, Heo G, Major PW. Three-dimensional orthodontic force measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct; 136(4): 518-28. .

  13. Devishree RA, Felicita AS. A survey on awareness of orthodontic treatment among male population reporting to dental clinic. JMSCR. 2016 Aug;4(8);11900-5. .

  14. Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Apr;123(4):416-22. .

  15. Andrade I Jr. Frictionless segmented mechanics for controlled space closure. Dent Press J Orthod. 2017 Feb;22(1):98-109. .

  16. Malik DES, Shahwar Malik DE, Fida M, Afzal E, Irfan S. Comparison of anchorage loss between conventional and self-ligating brackets during canine retraction-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthod. 2020 Mar;18(1):41-53. .

  17. Sivamurthy G, Sundari S. Stress distribution patterns at mini-implant site during retraction and intrusion-a three-dimensional finite element study. Prog Orthod. 2016;17(1):4. .

  18. Samantha C, Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S, Sivamurty G, Dinesh S. Comparative evaluation of two bis-GMA based orthodontic bonding adhesives: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC40-4. .

  19. Krishnan S, Pandian S, Kumar SA. Effect of bisphosphonates on orthodontic tooth movement-an update. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):ZE01-5. .

  20. Vikram NR, Prabhakar R, Kumar SA, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R. Ball headed mini implant. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):ZL02-3. .

  21. Kamisetty SK, Verma JK, Arun, Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S, Kumar A. SBS vs. inhouse recycling methods-an invitro evaluation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Sep;9(9):ZC04-8. .

  22. Viswanath A, Ramamurthy J, Dinesh SPS, Srinivas A. Obstructive sleep apnea: Awakening the hidden truth. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;18(1):1-7. .

  23. Felicita AS. Quantification of intrusive/retraction force and moment generated during en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants: A conceptual approach. Dent Press J Orthod. 2017 Sep;22(5):47-55. .

  24. Rubika J, Sumathi Felicita A, Sivambiga V. Gonial angle as an indicator for the prediction of growth pattern. World J Dent. 2015;6(3):161-3. .

  25. Jain RK, Kumar SP, Manjula WS. Comparison of intrusion effects on maxillary incisors among mini implant anchorage, j-hook headgear and utility arch. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jul;8(7):ZC21-4. .

  26. Pandian KS, Krishnan S, Kumar SA. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Mar;29(2):137-43. .

  27. Ramesh Kumar KR, Shanta Sundari KK, Venkatesan A, Chandrasekar S. Depth of resin penetration into enamel with 3 types of enamel conditioning methods: A confocal microscopic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct 1;140(4):479-85. .

  28. Felicita AS. Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and partially impacted canine with unilateral extraction: A case report. Saudi Dent J. 2017 Oct;29(4):185-93. .

  29. Felicita AS, Chandrasekar S, Shanthasundari KK. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: A modified approach (sagittal relation). Indian J Dent Res. 2012 May;23(3):305-12. .

  30. Dinesh SPS, Aran AV, Sundari KKS, Samantha C, Ambika K. An indigenously designed apparatus for measuring orthodontic force. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Nov;7(11):2623-6. .

  31. Felicita AS. Orthodontic extrusion of Ellis class VIII fracture of maxillary lateral incisor - The sling shot method. Saudi Dent J. 2018 Jul;30(3):265-9. .

  32. Anbu RT, Suresh V, Gounder R, Kannan A. Comparison of the efficacy of three different bone regeneration materials: An animal study. Eur J Dent. 2019 Feb;13(1):22-8. .

  33. Ashok V, Ganapathy D. A geometrical method to classify face forms. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Jul;9(3): 232-5. .

  34. Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of coated surfaces influencing screw loosening in implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Dent. 2017 Dec;8(6):496-502. .

  35. Jain AR. Clinical and functional outcomes of implant prostheses in fibula free flaps. World J Dent. 2017 Jun;8(3):171-6. .

  36. Ariga P, Nallaswamy A, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of correlation of width of maxillary anterior teeth using extraoral and intraoral factors in Indian population: A systematic review. World J Dent. 2018 Feb;9(1):68-75. .

  37. Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy in ceramic laminate veneering materials: A SEM analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Apr;8(2):272-8. .

  38. Jain AR. Prevalence of partial edentulousness and treatment needs in rural population of South India. World J Dent. 2017 Jun;8(3):213-7. .

  39. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Sivaprakasam AN. Compatibility of nonoriginal abutments with implants: Evaluation of microgap at the implant-abutment interface, with original and nonoriginal abutments. Implant Dent. 2019 Jun;28(3):289-95. .

  40. Gupta P, Ariga P, Deogade SC. Effect of monopoly-coating agent on the surface roughness of a tissue conditioner subjected to cleansing and disinfection: A contact profilometric study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jun;9(Suppl 1):S122-6. .

  41. Varghese SS, Ramesh A, Veeraiyan DN. Blended module-based teaching in biostatistics and research methodology: A retrospective study with postgraduate dental students. J Dent Educ. 2019 Apr;83(4):445-50. .

  42. Ziegler P, Ingervall B. A clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Feb;95(2):99-106. .

  43. Aljhani AS, Zawawi KH. Nonextraction treatment of severe crowding with the aid of corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. Case Rep Dent. 2012 Jul 17;2012:694527. .

  44. Nosouhian S, Rismanchian M, Sabzian R, Shadmehr E, Badrian H, Davoudi A. A mini-review on the effect of mini-implants on contemporary orthodontic science. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):83-7. .

  45. Rajesh M, Kishore M, Shetty KS. Comparison of anchorage loss following initial leveling and aligning using ROTH and MBT prescription-a clinical prospective study. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Apr;6(2):16-21. .

  46. Thiruvenkatachari B, Pavithranand A, Rajasigamani K, Kyung HM. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr 1;129(4):551-4. .

  47. Park H-S, Lee S-K, Kwon O-W. Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2005 Jul;75(4):602-9. .

  48. Naik MK, Dharmadeep G, Muralidhar Reddy Y, Cherukuri S, Praveen Raj K, Reddy V. Comparison of the anchorage value of the first molars supported with implant and first molars supported with second molar during en masse retraction. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Feb 5;10(1):9-15. .

  49. Basha AG, Shantaraj R, Mogegowda SB. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and enmasse retraction using orthodontic micro implant. Implant Dent. 2010 Apr;19(2):128-36. .

  50. Gupta N, Gupta G, Umasankar K, Sundari KKS. Establishing the cephalometric values for tetragon analysis in patients with class I occlusion: A cephalometric study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):597-600. .

1437 Просмотры статей 468 Загрузка статей Метрики
1437 ПРОСМОТРЫ 468 ЗАГРУЗКИ Google
Scholar
ЦИТАТЫ

Статьи с похожим содержанием:

Effectiveness of Rib Cage Mobility Exercises versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Trunk Impairment in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Randomized Trial Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.34, 2022, issue 4
Disha Parmar, Sayali Joshi, Praveen S. Bagalkot, Sanjay Parmar, Lakshita Shah
Comparison of Malondialdehyde Levels among Patients with Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Anodized Surface Dental Implants: A Prospective Clinical Study Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.34, 2024, issue 3
Sheeja S. Varghese, Arvina Rajasekar
A Study to Assess the Effect of Post Isometric Relaxation versus Isolytic Contraction on Range of Motion in Individuals with Hamstring Tightness Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.34, 2022, issue 2
Ashmita Iora Patrao, Awina Joanita D'souza, Leah Mohandas
Retrospective Multivariate Clinical Analysis of 2707 Dental Implants with Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces: Survival Rates after Up to 5 Years Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.32, 2022, issue 1
Carolina Accorsi Cartelli, Sergio Rocha Bernardes, Vanessa Helena Jamcoski, Larissa Carvalho Trojan, Marcos Boaventura de Moura, Geninho Thomé
A Pilot Study Investigating the Use of At-Home, Web-Based Questionnaires Compiling Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Hip and Knee Replacement Surgeries Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.23, 2013, issue 1
B. McConnell, P. Lewis, H. Gakhar, Alexandros P. Apostolopoulos

Статьи, принятые к публикации

Transfer of guided emergence profile developed using customized provisional implant restoration and cementation using an abutment replica technique- A case report. Vinay Sivaswamy, Balaji Anand S D, Jacob Mathew Philip, C J Venkatakrishnan, Narasimman M, Helen Mary Abraham, Pavithra B Marijuana use is Associated with Increased Rates of Hip Dislocation and Lower Insurance Reimbursement among THA Recipients Andrew Recker, Chukwuweike Gwam, Erin Kelly, Scott Douglas, Johannes Plate Surface modification of Mg alloy AZ91D using nanopowder mixed EDM for Biodegradable Implant Alok Kumar, Abhishek Singh The history of orthopedics in the long term: from general medicine to medical specialties Pavlos Altsitzioglou, Ioannis Zafeiris, Fotini Soucacos, Pantelis Limneos, Eleftheria Souliotis, Evanthia Mitsiokapa, Theodosis Saranteas, Andreas Mavrogenis COMPARISON OF ROUGHNESS, WETTABILITY AND SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY FEATURES BETWEEN SANDBLASTED ACID-ETCHED AND OXIDIZED TITANIUM DENTAL IMPLANTS Kshitiz Chhabra, Arvina Rajasekar CORRELATION BETWEEN PRIMARY STABILITY OF DENTAL IMPLANTS AND BONE DENSITY: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS Padmaja S, Arvina Rajasekar C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - less implant equals quicker normalization Kasım Kılıçarslan, Ömer Faruk Naldöven, Enejd Veizi, Şahan Güven, Şahin Çepni, Ahmet Fırat COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING SHORT FEMORAL NAIL FIXATION FOR INTETROCHANTERIC HIP FRACTURES. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Anastasia Vasilopoulou, Antonios Trichonas, Konstantinos Palaiologos, Emmanouel Antonogiannakis, Christos Nikakis, Stavros Angelis, Spyridon Maris, Christos Grekas , Efthimios Karadimas, Alexandros Apostolopoulos FEA: Connector Designs and Pontic Stress Distribution of Fixed Partial Denture Implant-Supported Metal Framework Saja Muhsin, Enas Mohammed, Khalid Bander Design and Frequency Stability Analysis of an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System based Artificial Pacemaker Controller in MATLAB Nader Jafarnia Dabanloo, Asghar Dabiriaghdam, Fereidoon Nooshirvan Rahatabad, Keivan Maghooli Complications following intraosseous injections of calcium phosphate bone cement in Subchondroplasty. Christos Zachariadis, Helen Leligou, Stauros Kourkoulis, Evaggelos Magnisalis, Panayiotis Papagelopoulos, Olga Savvidou The Impact of Patient Characteristics on Outcomes of Surgically Managed Vertebral Osteomyelitis in the United States: Insights from a National Database Study Jennifer Kurowicki, Stuart Changoor, Daniel Coban, Neil Patel, Kumar Sinha, Ki Hwang, Arash Emami ASSOCIATION OF AGE, GENDER AND SITE OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT - AN INSTITUTION BASED RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Harini Sri, Nabeel Ahmed, Keerthi Shasanka
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции Цены и условия подписки Begell House Контакты Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain