Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research
Главный редактор: Atle Jensen (open in a new tab)
Заместитель главного редактора: Valery Oliynik (open in a new tab)
Редактор-основатель: Victor T. Grinchenko (open in a new tab)

Выходит 6 номеров в год

ISSN Печать: 2152-5102

ISSN Онлайн: 2152-5110

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.1 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.3 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.0002 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.33 SJR: 0.256 SNIP: 0.49 CiteScore™:: 2.4 H-Index: 23

Indexed in

Получить доступ(open in a new tab)
Более
Приобрести $105.00(open in a new tab) Проверить подписку Скачать MARC запись(open in a new tab) Получить разрешения(open in a new tab)

DRAG REDUCTION BY POLYMERS: A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE HISTORY, RESEARCH PROGRESS, AND PROSPECTS

Том 48, Выпуск 6, 2021, pp. 1-21
DOI: 10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.2021038352
Get accessGet access
Xin Zhang
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
Xili Duan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3X5, CANADA
Yuri S. Muzychka
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1B 3X5, Canada

Краткое описание

Researchers have investigated the phenomenon of flow drag reduction by polymers for more than 70 years. A lot of progress has been made on understanding the physical process and its wide range of applications in engineering. There are also unsolved problems related to the mechanism of drag reduction and its degradation, and still new technologies and applications for further research and development. This review first summarizes the history of drag reduction by polymers, focusing on technology development and engineering applications. Then, the research progress on drag reduction by polymer additives and its degradation problem is critically reviewed, with a useful summary and analysis of the various numerical and experimental methods and correlations developed. We discuss the difficulties in understanding the mechanism behind the drag reduction and degradation phenomena and offer some new explanations. Lastly, a few promising research topics for future work are discussed.

Ключевые слова: drag reduction, polymer, mechanism, correlation, degradation
ЛИТЕРАТУРА

  1. Abdulbari, H.A., Ling, F.W., Hassan, Z., and Thin, H.J., Experimental Investigations on Biopolymer in Enhancing the Liquid Flow in Microchannel, Adv. Polym. Tech., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 3136-3145, 2018a.

  2. Abdulbari, H.A., Salleh, M.A.M., Rashed, M.K., and Ismail, M.H.S., Passive, Active, and Interactive Drag-Reduction Technique to Reduce Friction and Enhance the Mixing Intensity in Rotating Disk Apparatus, Chem. Eng. Commun., vol. 205, no. 12, pp. 1623-1640, 2018b.

  3. Anderson, G.F. and Wu, Y.K., Drag Reduction by Use of MHD Boundary-Layer Control, J. Hydronaut., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 150-152, 1971.

  4. Anderson, G.W., Rohr, J.J., and Stanley, S.D., The Combined Drag Effects of Riblets and Polymers in Pipe Flow, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 213-221, 1993.

  5. Bakajin, O.B., Duke, T.A.J., Chou, C.F., Chan, S.S., Austin, R.H., and Cox, E.C., Electrohydrodynamic Stretching of DNA in Confined Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 2737-2740,1998.

  6. Bewersdorff, H.W., Gyr, A., Hoyer, K., and Tsinober, A., An Investigation of Possible Mechanisms of Heterogeneous Drag Reduction in Pipe and Channel Flows, Rheol. Acta., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 140-149, 1993.

  7. Brautlecht, C.A. and Sethi, J.R., Flow of Paper Pulps in Pipe Lines, Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 283-288, 1933.

  8. Brostow, W., Lobland, H.E.H., Reddy, T., Singh, R.P., and White, L., Lowering Mechanical Degradation of Drag Reducers in Turbulent Flow, J. Mater. Res, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 56-60, 2007.

  9. Burger, E.D., Chorn, L.G., and Perkins, T.K., Studies of Drag Reduction Conducted over a Broad Range of Pipeline Conditions When Flowing Prudhoe Bay Crude Oil, J. Rheol, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 603-626, 1980.

  10. Burger, E.D., Munk, W.R., and Wahl, H.A., Flow Increase in the Trans Alaska Pipeline through Use of a Polymeric Drag-Reducing Additive, J. Pet. Technol., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 377-386,1982.

  11. Camail, M., Margaillan, A., Maesano, J.C., Thuret, S., and Vernet, J.L., Synthesis and Structural Study ofNew Copolymers, Based on Acrylamide and N-Acryloyl Acids, with Persistent Drag Reduction Activity, Polymer, vol. 39, no. 14, pp. 3187-3192,1998.

  12. Cao, D., Li, C., Li, H., and Yang, F., Effect of Dispersing Time on the Prediction Equation of Drag Reduction Rate and Its Application in the Short Distance Oil Pipeline, Pet. Sci. Technol., vol. 36, no. 16, pp. 1312-1318,2018.

  13. Carradine, W.R., Grabois, R.N., Hanna, G.J., and Pace, G.F., High-Performance Flow Improver for Products Lines, Oil Gas J., vol. 81, no. 32, pp. 92-96, 1983.

  14. Choi, H.J., Kim, C.A., and Jhon, M.S., Universal Drag Reduction Characteristics of Polyisobutylene in a Rotating Disk Apparatus, Polymer, vol. 40, no. 16, pp. 4527-4530, 1999.

  15. Choi, H.J., Kim, C.A., Sohn, J.I., and Jhon, M.S., An Exponential Decay Function for Polymer Degradation in Turbulent Drag Reduction, Polym. Degrad. Stabil., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 341-346,2000.

  16. Choi, H.J., Lim, S.T., Lai, P.Y., and Chan, C.K., Turbulent Drag Reduction and Degradation of DNA, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 89, no. 8, p. 088302, 2002.

  17. Choueiri, G.H., Lopez, J.M., and Hof, B., Exceeding the Asymptotic Limit of Polymer Drag Reduction, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 120, no. 12, p. 124501,2018.

  18. Christodoulou, C., Liu, K.N., and Joseph, D.D., Combined Effects of Riblets and Polymers on Drag Reduction in Pipes, Phys. Fluid, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 995-996, 1991.

  19. Dai, X., Li, L., Yin, S., Zhang, G., and Ge, J., The Drag Reduction and Degradation Characteristics of Poly a Olefin in Diesel via Rotating Disk Apparatus, Pet. Sci. Technol., vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 981-986, 2018.

  20. Daoudi, M.S. and Dajani, M.S., The 1967 Oil Embargo Revisited, J Palest. Stud., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 65-90, 1984.

  21. Darby, R. and Chang, H.F.D., Generalized Correlation for Friction Loss in Drag Reducing Polymer Solutions, AIChE J, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 274-280, 1984.

  22. Darby, R. and Pivsa-Art, S., An Improved Correlation for Turbulent Drag Reduction in Dilute Polymer Solutions, Can. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1395-1400,1991.

  23. De Gennes, P.G., Molecular Individualism, Science, vol. 276, no. 5321, pp. 1999-2000,1997.

  24. De Gennes, P.G., Soft Matter (Nobel Lecture), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 842-845, 1992.

  25. De Gennes, P.G., Towards a Scaling Theory of Drag Reduction, Physica A, vol. 140, nos. 1-2, pp. 9-25, 1986.

  26. Dealy, J.M., Weissenberg and Deborah Numbers-Their Definition and Use, Rheol. Bull., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 14-18, 2010.

  27. Den Toonder, J.M.J., Hulsen, M.A., Kuiken, G.D.C., andNieuwstadt, F.T.M., Drag Reduction by Polymer Additives in a Turbulent Pipe Flow: Numerical and Laboratory Experiments, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 337, pp. 193-231,1997.

  28. Devanand, K. and Selser, J.C., Polyethylene Oxide Does Not Necessarily Aggregate in Water, Nature, vol. 343, no. 6260, pp. 739-741, 1990.

  29. Dodge, D.W. and Metzner, A.B., Turbulent Flow ofNon-Newtonian Systems, AIChE J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 189-204, 1959.

  30. Dos Santos, W.R., Caser, E.S., Soares, E.J., and Siqueira, R.N., Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flows by Diutan Gum: A Very Stable Natural Drag Reducer, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid, vol. 276, p. 104223, 2020.

  31. Edomwonyi-Out, L.C. and Adelakun, D.O., Effect of Heavy Molecular Weight Polymer on Quality of Drinking Water, Mater. Today Commun, vol. 15, pp. 337-343,2018.

  32. Eskin, D., Modeling an Effect of Pipe Diameter on Turbulent Drag Reduction, Chem. Eng. Sci, vol. 162, pp. 66-68, 2017.

  33. Fabula, A.G., Fire-Fighting Benefits of Polymeric Friction Reduction, J. Basic Eng., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 453-455, 1971.

  34. Faruqui, F.I., Otten, M.D., and Polimeni, P.I., Protection against Atherogenesis with the Polymer Drag-Reducing Agent Separan AP-30, Circulation, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 627-635, 1987.

  35. Figueredo, R.C.R. and Sabadini, E., Firefighting Foam Stability: The Effect of the Drag Reducer Poly (Ethylene) Oxide, Colloids Surf. A, vol. 215, nos. 1-3, pp. 77-86,2003.

  36. Forrest, F. and Grierson, G.A., Friction Losses in Cast Iron Pipe Carrying Paper Stock, Pap. Trade J., vol. 92, no. 22, pp. 39-41, 1931.

  37. Frings, B., Heterogeneous Drag Reduction in Turbulent Pipe Flows Using Various Injection Techniques, Rheol. Acta., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 92-110, 1988.

  38. Gallego, F. and Shah, S.N., Friction Pressure Correlations for Turbulent Flow of Drag Reducing Polymer Solutions in Straight and Coiled Tubing, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 65, nos. 3-4, pp. 147-161, 2009.

  39. Gasljevic, K., Hall, K., Chapman, D., and Matthys, E.F., Drag-Reducing Polysaccharides from Marine Microalgae: Species Productivity and Drag Reduction Effectiveness, J. Appl. Phycol., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 299-310, 2008.

  40. Gordon, R.J., On the Explanation and Correlation of Turbulent Drag Reduction in Dilute Macromolecular Solutions, J. Appl. Polym. Sci, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2097-2105, 1970.

  41. Gordon, R.J., Turbulent Drag Reduction in Dilute Polymer Solutions: The Deborah Number Dilemma, Chem. Eng. J, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 137-139,1971.

  42. Hassid, S. and Poreh, M., A Turbulent Energy Dissipation Model for Flows with Drag Reduction, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 107-112, 1978.

  43. Hassid, S. and Poreh, M., A Turbulent Energy Model for Flows with Drag Reduction, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 234-241, 1975.

  44. Hassid, S.A., Reynolds Stress Model for Flows with Drag Reduction, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 159-165,1979.

  45. Hong, C.H., Choi, H.J., and Kim, J.H., Rotating Disk Apparatus for Polymer-Induced Turbulent Drag Reduction, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1908-1913, 2008.

  46. Hong, C.H., Choi, H.J., Zhang, K., Renou, F., and Grisel, M., Effect of Salt on Turbulent Drag Reduction of Xanthan Gum, Carbohyd. Polym, vol. 121, pp. 342-347, 2015.

  47. Hong, C.H., Zhang, K., Choi, H.J., and Yoon, S.M., Mechanical Degradation of Polysaccharide Guar Gum under Turbulent Flow, J. Ind. Eng. Chem, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 178-180,2010.

  48. Houthakker, H.S., Whatever Happened to the Energy Crisis?, Energy J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-8, 1983.

  49. Hoyt, J.W., "Negative Roughness" and Polymer Drag Reduction, Exp. Fluids, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 142-146, 1991.

  50. Hoyt, J.W. and Sellin, R.H.J., Scale Effects in Polymer Solution Pipe Flow, Exp. Fluids, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 70-74,1993.

  51. Hoyt, J.W. and Soli, G., Algal Cultures: Ability to Reduce Turbulent Friction in Flow, Science, vol. 149, no. 3691, pp. 1509-1511, 1965.

  52. Hoyt, J.W., High Molecular Weight Algal Substances in the Sea, Mar. Biol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 93-99, 1970.

  53. Huang, C. and Wei, J., Experimental Study on the Collaborative Drag Reduction Performance of a Surfactant Solution in Grooved Channels, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 34, pp. 159-170, 2017.

  54. Huang, C., Liu, D., and Wei, J., Experimental Study on Drag Reduction Performance of Surfactant Flow in Longitudinal Grooved Channels, Chem. Eng. Sci, vol. 152, pp. 267-279, 2016.

  55. Hunston, D.L., Drag Reduction in Polymer Mixtures and the Effect of Molecular Weight Distribution, Nature, vol. 251, no. 5477, pp. 697-698, 1974.

  56. Hutchison, K.J., Campbell, J.D., and Karpinski, E., Decreased Poststenotic Flow Disturbance during Drag Reduction by Polyacrylamide Infusion without Increased Aortic Blood Flow, Microvasc. Res., vol. 38, no. 1,pp. 102-109, 1989.

  57. Ibrahim, A.F., Nasr-El-Din, H.A., Rabie, A., Lin, G., Zhou, J., and Qu, Q., A New Friction-Reducing Agent for Slickwater-Fracturing Treatments, SPEProd. Oper., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 583-595, 2018.

  58. Jouenne, S., Anfray, J., Levitt, D., Souilem, I., Marchal, P., Lemaitre, C., Choplin, L., Nesvik, J., and Waldman, T., Degradation (or Lack Thereof) and Drag Reduction of HPAM Solutions during Transport in Turbulent Flow in Pipelines, Oil Gas Facilities, vol. 4, no. 1,pp. 80-92,2015.

  59. Kamel, A. and Shah, S.N., Effects of Salinity and Temperature on Drag Reduction Characteristics of Polymers in Straight Circular Pipes, J Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 67, pp. 23-33,2009.

  60. Kameneva, M.V., Wu, Z.J., Uraysh, A., Repko, B., Litwak, K.N., Billiar, T.R., Fink, M.P., Simmons, R.L., Griffith, B.P., and Borovetz, H.S., Blood Soluble Drag-Reducing Polymers Prevent Lethality from Hemorrhagic Shock in Acute Animal Experiments, Biorheology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 53-64,2004.

  61. Karami, H.R., Keyhani, M., and Mowla, D., Experimental Analysis of Drag Reduction in the Pipelines with Response Surface Methodology, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 138, pp. 104-112, 2016.

  62. Kenis, P.R., Drag Reduction by Bacterial Metabolites, Nature, vol. 217, no. 5132, pp. 940-942, 1968.

  63. Khalil, M.F., Kassab, S.Z., Elmiligui, A.A., and Naoum, F.A., Applications of Drag-Reducing Polymers in Sprinkler Irrigation Systems: Sprinkler Head Performance, J. Irrig. Drain Eng., vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 147-152, 2002.

  64. Khomyakov, A. and Elyukhina, I., Complete Dynamic Similarity for Sea Trials and Towing Tank Experiments by Means of Polymer Drag Reduction, Ocean Eng., vol. 178, pp. 31-37,2019.

  65. Kim, K. and Sirviente, A.I., Wall versus Centerline Polymer Injection in Turbulent Channel Flows, Flow Turbul. Combust., vol. 78, no. 1,pp. 69-89,2007.

  66. Kim, K. and Sureshkumar, R., Synergy in the Organization of Near-Wall and Bulk Turbulence Structures in Viscoelastic Turbulent Channel Flow in the High Drag Reduction Regime, Phys. Fluids, vol. 32, no. 3, p. 031703,2020.

  67. Kim, C.A., Jo, D.S., Choi, H.J., Kim, C.B., and Jhon, M.S., A High-Precision Rotating Disk Apparatus for Drag Reduction Characterization, Polym. Test., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 43-48, 2000.

  68. Kim, C.A., Lee, K., Choi, H.J., Kim, C.B., Kim, K.Y., and Jhon, M.S., Universal Characteristics of Drag Reducing Polyisobutylene in Kerosene, J. Macromol. Sci. A., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 705-711, 1997.

  69. Kim, C.A., Sung, J.H., Choi, H.J., Kim, C.B., Chun, W., and Jhon, M.S., Drag Reduction and Mechanical Degradation of Poly (Ethylene Oxide) in Seawater, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 803-811,1999.

  70. Kotenko, M., Oskarsson, H., Bojesen, C., and Nielsen, M.P., An Experimental Study of the Drag Reducing Surfactant for District Heating and Cooling, Energy, vol. 78, pp. 72-78, 2019.

  71. Koury, E. and Virk, P.S., Drag Reduction by Polymer Solutions in a Riblet-Lined Pipe, Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 323-347, 1995.

  72. Le Brun, N., Zadrazil, I., Norman, L., Bismarck, A., and Markides, C.N., On the Drag Reduction Effect and Shear Stability of Improved Acrylamide Copolymers for Enhanced Hydraulic Fracturing, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 146, pp. 135-143, 2016.

  73. Lescarboura, J.A., Culter, J.D., and Wahl, H.A., Drag Reduction with a Polymeric Additive in Crude Oil Pipelines, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 229-235, 1971.

  74. Li, W. and Graham, M.D., Polymer Induced Drag Reduction in Exact Coherent Structures of Plane Poiseuille Flow, Phys. Fluids, vol. 19, no. 8, p. 083101,2007.

  75. Lim, S.T., Choi, H.J., Lee, S.Y., So, J.S., and Chan, C.K., λ-DNA Induced Turbulent Drag Reduction and Its Characteristics, Macromolecules, vol. 36, no. 14, pp. 5348-5354, 2003.

  76. Lim, S.T., Choi, H.J., and Chan, C.K., Effect of Turbulent Flow on Coil-Globule Transition of λ-DNA, Macromol. Rapid Commun., vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 1237-1240, 2005a.

  77. Lim, S.T., Park, S.J., Chan, C.K., and Choi, H.J., Turbulent Drag Reduction Characteristics Induced by Calf-Thymus DNA, Physica A, vol. 350, no. 1, pp. 84-88, 2005b.

  78. Little, R.C. and Ting, R.Y., Number-Average and Viscosity-Average Molecular Weights of Popular Drag Reducing Polymers, J. Chem. Eng. Data, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 422-423,1976.

  79. Lopez, J.M., Choueiri, G.H., and Hof, B., Dynamics of Viscoelastic Pipe Flow at Low Reynolds Numbers in the Maximum Drag Reduction Limit, J. FluidMech, vol. 874, pp. 699-719, 2019.

  80. Lueth, C.A. and Shaqfeh, E.S., Experimental and Numerical Studies of Tethered DNA Shear Dynamics in the Flow-Gradient Plane, Macromolecules, vol. 42, no. 22, pp. 9170-9182, 2009.

  81. Ma, Y., Zheng, X., Shi, F., Li, Y., and Sun, S., Synthesis of Poly(Dodecyl Methacrylate)s and Their Drag-Reducing Properties, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 1622-1626,2003.

  82. Mizunuma, H., Ueda, K., and Yokouchi, Y., Synergistic Effects in Turbulent Drag Reduction by Riblets and Polymer Additives, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 533-540, 1999.

  83. Motta, M.V.L., De Castro, E.V.R., Muri, E.J.B., Costalonga, M.L., Loureiro, B.V., and Filgueiras, P.R., Study of the Mechanical Degradation Mechanism of Guar Gum in Turbulent Flow by FTIR, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 121, pp. 23-28, 2019.

  84. Muth, C.L., Husen, G.J., and Lewis, M.H., Stansberry, C.J., and Ziobro, M.S., Powerful New Tool for Pipeliners Flow Improver, Pipeline Gas J, vol. 212, no. 6, pp. 38-40, 1985.

  85. Muth, C.L., Monahan, M.J., and Pessetto, L.S., Application of Drag Reducing Agents Effect Cost Savings, Pipe Line Ind., vol. 65, no. 1,pp. 43-44, 1986.

  86. Myska, J. andMik, V., Application of a Drag Reducing Surfactant in the Heating Circuit, Energy Build, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 813-819, 2003.

  87. Nadolink, R.H. and Haigh, W.W., Bibliography on Skin Friction Reduction with Polymers and Other Boundary-Layer Additives, Appl. Mech. Rev, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 351-460, 1995.

  88. Nguyen, T.C., Romero, B., Vinson, E., and Wiggins, H., Effect of Salt on the Performance of Drag Reducers in Slickwater Fracturing Fluids, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 163, pp. 590-599, 2018.

  89. Nifant'ev, I.E., Shlyakhtin, A.V., Tavtorkin, A.N., Korchagina, S.A., Chinova, M.S., Vinogradov, A.A., Vinogradov, A.A., Roznyatovsky, V.A., Khaidapova, D.D., and Ivchenko, P.V., The Synthesis of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Poly (1-Hexene)s by Low-Temperature Ziegler-Natta Precipitation Polymerization in Fluorous Reaction Media, Polymer, vol. 139, pp. 98-106,2018.

  90. Oba, R., Ito, Y., and Uranishi, K., Effect of Polymer Additives on Cavitation Development and Noise in Water Flow through an Orifice, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 493-499, 1978.

  91. Owolabi, B.E., Dennis, D.J., and Poole, R.J., Turbulent Drag Reduction by Polymer Additives in Parallel-Shear Flows, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 827, p. R4,2017.

  92. Phukan, S., Kumar, P., Panda, J., Nayak, B.R., Tiwari, K.N., and Singh, R.P., Application of Drag Reducing Commercial and Purified Guargum for Reduction of Energy Requirement of Sprinkler Irrigation and Percolation Rate of the Soil, Agric. Water Man., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 101-118, 2001.

  93. Poole, R.J., The Deborah and Weissenberg Numbers, Rheol. Bull., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 32-39,2012.

  94. Ptasinski, P.K., Boersma, B.J., Nieuwstadt, F.T.M., Hulsen, M.A., Van den Brule, B.H.A.A., and Hunt, J.C.R., Turbulent Channel Flow near Maximum Drag Reduction: Simulations, Experiments and Mechanisms, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 490, pp. 251-291,2003.

  95. Ramus, J., Kenney, B.E., and Shaughnessy, E.J., Drag Reducing Properties of Microalgal Exopolymers, Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 550-557, 1989.

  96. Reitzer, H., Gebel, C., and Scrivener, O., Effect of Polymeric Additives on Cavitation and Radiated Noise in Water Flowing past a Circular Cylinder, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 71-79, 1985.

  97. Rodriguez, J.M., Zakin, J.L., and Patterson, G.K., Correlation of Drag Reduction with Modified Deborah Number for Dilute Polymer Solutions, Soc. Pet. Eng. J, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 325-332, 1967.

  98. Rowin, W.A., Sanders, R.S., and Ghaemi, S., A Recipe for Optimum Mixing of Polymer Drag Reducers, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 140, p. 111402,2018.

  99. Sachdev, S., Muralidharan, A., and Boukany, P.E., Molecular Processes Leading to "Necking" in Extensional Flow of Polymer Solutions: Using Microfluidics and Single DNA Imaging, Macromolecules, vol. 49, no. 24, pp. 9578-9585, 2016.

  100. Sar,N. and Rosenberg, E., Fish Skin Bacteria: Production of Friction-Reducing Polymers, Microb. Ecol., vol. 17, no. 1,pp. 27-38, 1989.

  101. Savins, J.G., A Stress-Controlled Drag-Reduction Phenomenon, Rheol. Acta, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 323-330, 1967.

  102. Savins, J.G., Drag Reduction Characteristics of Solutions of Macromolecules in Turbulent Pipe Flow, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., vol. 4, no. 03, pp. 203-214, 1964.

  103. Sawchuk, A.P., Unthank, J.L., and Dalsing, M.C., Drag Reducing Polymers May Decrease Atherosclerosis by Increasing Shear in Areas Normally Exposed to Low Shear Stress, J. Vasc. Surg, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 761-764, 1999.

  104. Schmitt, G., Drag Reduction by Corrosion Inhibitors-A Neglected Option for Mitigation of Flow Induced Localized Corrosion, Mater. Corros., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 329-343, 2001.

  105. Sedahmed, G.H., Abdo, M.S.E., Amer, M.A., and El-Latif, G.A., Effect of Drag Reducing Polymers on the Rate of Mass Transfer Controlled Corrosion in Pipelines under Developing Turbulent Flow, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 531-538, 1999.

  106. Sedahmed, G.H., Abdo, M.S.E., Farag, H.A., and Tantawy, S.G., The Use of Drag-Reducing Polymers as Corrosion Inhibitors in Pipelines, Surf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 359-363, 1979.

  107. Sedahmed, G.H., Farag, H.A., Abdo, M.S.E., and Tantawy, S.G., Inhibition of Diffusion Controlled Corrosion in Pipelines by Drag Reducing Polymers under Turbulent Flow Conditions, J. Appl. Electrochem., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 75-78, 1984.

  108. Sellin, R.H.J.,Drag Reduction in Sewers: First Results from a Permanent Installation, J. Hydraul. Res., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 357-371, 1978.

  109. Sellin, R.H.J., Use of Polymer Additives to Relieve Overloaded Sewers, P. I. Civil Eng., vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 997-1006, 1983.

  110. Sever, F.A. and Metzner, A.B., Turbulent Flow Properties of Viscoelastic Fluids, Can. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 121-126, 1967.

  111. Shah, S. and Vyas, A., Temperature and Salinity Effects on Drag-Reduction Characteristics of Polymers in Coiled Tubing, SPE Prod. Oper., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55-66,2011.

  112. Shah, S.N. and Kamel, A.H., Investigation of Flow Behavior of Slickwater in Large Straight and Coiled Tubing, SPE Prod. Oper., vol. 25, no. 1,pp. 70-79,2010.

  113. Shah, S.N., Tareen, M., and Clark, D., Effects of Solids Loading on Drag Reduction in Polymeric Drilling Fluids through Straight and Coiled Tubing, J. Can. Pet. Technol., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 63-69, 2002.

  114. Smith, S.B., Finzi, L., and Bustamante, C., Direct Mechanical Measurements of the Elasticity of Single DNA Molecules by Using Magnetic Beads, Science, vol. 258, no. 5085, pp. 1122-1126, 1992.

  115. Soares, E.J., Review of Mechanical Degradation and De-Aggregation of Drag Reducing Polymers in Turbulent Flows, J. Non-Newton. Fluid, vol. 276, p. 104225, 2020.

  116. Soares, E.J., Siqueira, R.N., Leal, L.M., Barbosa, K.C., Cipriano, D.F., and Freitas, J.C., The Role Played by the Aging of Aloe Vera on Its Drag Reduction Properties in Turbulent Flows, J. Non-Newton. Fluid, vol. 265, pp. 1-10, 2019.

  117. Tabor, M. and De Gennes, P.G., A Cascade Theory of Drag Reduction, Europhys. Lett., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 519-522,1986.

  118. Teixeira, R.E., Babcock, H.P., and Shaqfeh, E.S., and Chu, S., Shear Thinning and Tumbling Dynamics of Single Polymers in the Flow-Gradient Plane, Macromolecules, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 581-592, 2005.

  119. Tesauro, C., Boersma, B.J., Hulsen, M.A., Ptasinski, P.K., and Nieuwstadt, F.T.M., Events of High Polymer Activity in Drag Reducing Flows, Flow Turbul. Combust., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 123-132, 2007.

  120. Test, F.L., Analytical Prediction of the Influence of Polymer Additives on the Shear Drag of Bodies of Revolution, J. Hydronaut., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 45-46,1974.

  121. Thais, L., Tejada-Martinez, A.E., Gatski, T.B., and Mompean, G., Temporal Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Viscoelastic Drag Reduction Flows, Phys. Fluids, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 013103, 2010.

  122. Toms, B.A., On the Early Experiments on Drag Reduction by Polymers, Phys. Fluids, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. S3-S5, 1977.

  123. Toms, B.A., Some Observations on the Flow of Linear Polymer Solutions through Straight Tubes at Large Reynolds Numbers, Proc. of 1st Int. Congress on Rheol., Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Co., pp. 135-141, 1948.

  124. Unthank, J.L., Lalka, S.G., Nixon, J.C., and Sawchuk, A.P., Improvement of Flow through Arterial Stenoses by Drag Reducing Agents, J. Surg. Res, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 625-630,1992.

  125. Virk, P.S. andBaher, H., The Effect of Polymer Concentration on Drag Reduction, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1183-1189, 1970.

  126. Virk, P.S., Drag Reduction Fundamentals, AIChEJ., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 625-656, 1975.

  127. Virk, P.S., Mickley, H.S., and Smith, K.A., The Ultimate Asymptote and Mean Flow Structure in Toms' Phenomenon, J. Appl. Mech., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 488-493, 1970.

  128. White, A., Effect of Polymer Additives on Boundary Layer Separation and Drag of Submerged Bodies, Nature, vol. 211, no. 5056, p. 1390, 1966.

  129. Xi, L., Turbulent Drag Reduction by Polymer Additives: Fundamentals and Recent Advances, Phys. Fluids, vol. 31, no. 12, p. 121302,2019.

  130. Yang, C., Changjun, L., Nechval, A.M., Peng, Y., and Zhukov, A.Y., Commercial Field Testing Improves Understanding of DRA Degradation, Oil Gas J, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 78-84, 2018.

  131. Yang, K.S., Choi, H.J., Kim, C.B., Kim, I.S., and Jhon, M.S., Characterization of Turbulent Drag Reduction in Rotating Disk System, Korean J. Chem. Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 8-13, 1994.

  132. Yang, S.Q. and Ding, D., Drag Reduction Induced by Polymer in Turbulent Pipe Flows, Chem. Eng. Sci, vol. 102, pp. 200-208, 2013.

  133. Yang, S.Q. and Ding, D., Drag-Reducing Flows in Laminar-Turbulent Transition Region, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 136, no. 10, p. 101202,2014.

  134. Yang, S.Q. and Dou, G.R., Modeling of Viscoelastic Turbulent Flow in Channel and Pipe, Phys. Fluids, vol. 20, no. 6, p. 065105, 2008.

  135. Yang, S.Q., Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flow with Polymer Additives, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 131, no. 5, p. 051301,2009.

  136. Zabihi, R., Mowla, D., and Karami, H.R., Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict Drag Reduction in Crude Oil Pipelines, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, pp. 586-593, 2019.

  137. Zahran, R.R. and Sedahmed, G.H., Effect of Drag-Reducing Polymers on the Rate of Flow-Induced Corrosion of Metals, Mater. Lett., vol. 35, nos. 3-4, pp. 207-213, 1998.

  138. Zahran, R.R. and Sedahmed, G.H., Galvanic Corrosion of Zinc in Turbulently Moving Saline Water Containing Drag Reducing Polymers, Mater. Lett., vol. 31, nos. 1-2, pp. 29-33,1997.

  139. Zakin, J.L., Myska, J., and Chara, Z., New Limiting Drag Reduction and Velocity Profile Asymptotes for Nonpolymeric Additives Systems, AIChE J, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 3544-3546, 1996.

  140. Zhang, X., Duan, X., and Muzychka, Y., Analytical Upper Limit of Drag Reduction with Polymer Additives in Turbulent Pipe Flow, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 140, no. 5, p. 051204, 2018a.

  141. Zhang, X., Duan, X., and Muzychka, Y., New Mechanism and Correlation for Degradation of Drag-Reducing Agents in Turbulent Flow with Measured Data from a Double-Gap Rheometer, Colloid Polym. Sci, vol. 296, no. 4, pp. 829-834, 2018b.

  142. Zhang, X., Duan, X., and Muzychka, Y., Degradation of Flow Drag Reduction with Polymer Additives-A New Molecular View, J Mol. Liq., vol. 292, p. 111360, 2019.

  143. Zhang, X., Duan, X., Muzychka, Y., and Wang, Z., Experimental Correlation for Pipe Flow Drag Reduction Using Relaxation Time of Linear Flexible Polymers in a Dilute Solution, Can. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 792-803,2020a.

  144. Zhang, X., Duan, X., and Muzychka, Y., Drag Reduction by Linear Flexible Polymers and Its Degradation in Turbulent Flow: A Phenomenological Explanation from Chemical Thermodynamics and Kinetics, Phys. Fluids, vol. 32, no. 1, p. 013101,2020b.

  145. Zhao, J., Chen, P., Liu, Y., Zhao, W., and Mao, J., Prediction of Field Drag Reduction by a Modified Practical Pipe Diameter Model, Chem. Eng. Technol, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1417-1424, 2018.

  146. Zhu, L. and Xi, L., Vortex Dynamics in Low- and High-Extent Polymer Drag Reduction Regimes Revealed by Vortex Tracking and Conformation Analysis, Phys. Fluids, vol. 31, no. 9, p. 095103, 2019.

  147. Zhu, L., Schrobsdorff, H., Schneider, T.M., and Xi, L., Distinct Transition in Flow Statistics and Vortex Eynamics between Low- and High-Extent Turbulent Drag Reduction in Polymer Fluids, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid, vol. 262, pp. 115-130,2018.

  148. Zimm, H., Dynamics of Polymer Molecules in Dilute Solution: Viscoelasticity, Flow Birefringence and Dielectric Loss, J. Chem. Phys, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 269-278, 1956.

6977 Просмотры статей 48 Загрузка статей Метрики
6977 ПРОСМОТРЫ 48 ЗАГРУЗКИ Google
Scholar ЦИТАТЫ

Статьи с похожим содержанием:

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN BIOHEAT AND MASS TRANSFER MODELING Annual Review of Heat Transfer, Vol.10, 1999, issue 10
Lisa X. Xu
Deep Neural Network for solving forward and inverse problems in heat transfer Proceedings of the 26thNational and 4th International ISHMT-ASTFE Heat and Mass Transfer Conference December 17-20, 2021, IIT Madras, Chennai-600036, Tamil Nadu, India, Vol.0, 2021, issue
Neeraj Kavan Chakshu, Hamid Reza Tamaddon-Jahromi, Perumal Nithiarasu
BIOINSPIRED FLOW OPTIMIZATION TSFP DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.5, 2007, issue
Nikolaus Hansen, Petros Koumoutsakos, Stefan Kern
DRAG REDUCTION BY COMBINED EFFECT OF SURFACTANT AND MICROGROOVES IN A PIPE FLOW Journal of Flow Visualization and Image Processing, Vol.28, 2021, issue 2
Xiaofang Lv, Shidong Zhou, Wen Liu, Liutong Fan, Pei Yao, Entian Li
HEAT TRANSFER IN TURBULENT FLOWS International Heat Transfer Conference 7, Vol.1, 1982, issue
Hiroaki Tanaka , Hiroshi Kawamura, Masaru Hirata, Nobuhide Kasagi

Последний выпуск

FLOW STRUCTURES IN THE WAKE REGION OF AN L-SHAPED CYLINDER AND A TRIANGULAR CYLINDER Arian Bahrami, Hamed H. Pourasl, Vahid M. Khojastehnezhad THEORETICAL STUDY OF A THREE-DIMENSIONAL TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER OVER A ROTATING CONE OR DISK Iqrar Raza, Ahmer Mehmood, Muhammad Usman ON PARAMETRIC STUDY OF FLUID LEAVES AND FLUID PINEAPPLE Vijayakumar Mathaiyan, Vijayanandh Raja, Beena Stanislaus Arputharaj A COMPUTATIONAL STUDY FOR AIR–SOLID PARTICLES FLOW PATTERNS IN RIB-ROUGHENED FLUIDIZED BED VESSELS Saqib Sharif, Muhammad Shakaib, Usman Allauddin

Статьи, принятые к публикации

Fluid Forces on Inclined Planes during Dam Break Scenarios: Towards a General Formula Jafar Gerdabi, Mohammad A. Esmaeili-Sikarudi Dual Solution and Analysis of Skin Friction, Nusselt Number, Sherwood Number of EMHD Tangent Hyperbolic Nanofluid with Viscous Dissipation and Suction Senbagaraja P, Poulomi De Offset coalescence behaviour of impacting low-surface tension droplet on high-surface-tension droplet Pragyan Kumar Sarma, Purbarun Dhar, ANUP PAUL Theoretical study of three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer over a rotating cone or disk Iqrar Raza, Ahmer Mehmood, Muhammad Usman Methods of Turbulent Combustion Investigation: A Review Article Mehdi Rahmati Flow structures in the wake region of an L-shaped cylinder and a triangular cylinder Arian Bahrami, Hamed H Pourasl , Vahid M Khojastehnezhad
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции Цены и условия подписки Begell House Контакты Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain